International standards are fast becoming a staple of records
management programs and practices around the world. These standards make
extensive knowledge and expertise available from seasoned records
professionals for the benefit of the records management community.
ISO 15489-1 Information and Documentation--Records Management--Part
h General became the world's records management standard in 2001
and has been accepted as a model by many sectors. In the United States,
for example, the National Archives and Records Administration has
affirmed the standard. It also has been adopted by the National Archives
in the United Kingdom.
There is an implementation document for ISO 15489: ISO/TR 15489-2
Information and Documentation--Records Management--Part 2: Guidelines.
Any records manager using ISO 15489--either in developing a new program
or evaluating an existing one--should become familiar with the related
implementation process known as DIRKS (Developing and Implementing a
Recordkeeping System).
Developing DIRKS
DIRKS: A Strategic Approach to Managing Business Information, also
known as the DIRKS Manual, is a methodology developed in Australia for
designing records management systems.
The DIRKS methodology was developed and tested throughout the 1990s
as part of a project undertaken by Australian recordkeeping authorities
and professionals to re-conceptualize records and recordkeeping. Other
parts of this project included
* The development of the world's first best-practice
recordkeeping standard, AS 4390, which became the basis for ISO 15489
* The defining of records as being primarily concerned with
providing key evidence of business activity
* Drafting and implementing new recordkeeping programs and
legislation
This project recognized how important quality recordkeeping would
be in an increasingly digital world and was an attempt to rebrand and
reposition recordkeeping in modern organizations. As Kate Cumming,
formerly of the National Archives of Australia (NAA), stated in a
presentation, "Records are not a by-product or adjunct to business
operations; they are a key evidence of, and information about, business
practice. Their appropriate management should be a fundamental business
concern."
In 2000, the NAA, in collaboration with the State Records Authority
of NSW, produced DIRKS as an online manual. It was to be an important
part of a program meant to encourage good recordkeeping in federal
Australian public-sector agencies. It is clear today, however, that
DIRKS has value for the private sector as well.
In fact, DIRKS has its origins in business systems analysis
methodologies that for years have been used in the information
management disciplines. By following its step-by-step approach,
organizations should be able to recognize and develop business systems
to manage evidence (records) of business activity. Organizations should
also be able to produce a series of key recordkeeping tools, such as:
* A business classification scheme that presents a hierarchical
scheme of the organization's functions, the activities carried out
to support those functions, and the transactions that occurred while
performing those activities. It is, in fact, evidence of those
transactions (e.g., letters, e-mails, receipts) that creates records.
* A metadata scheme
* A disposal scheme to enable the systematic disposal of records
when it had been determined that they no longer supported the
organization's business
* Security and access classification schemes
Perhaps the important thing to note is that if such a comprehensive
methodology were implemented and tested effectively across a national
jurisdiction, it would likely become a powerful adjunct to the original
project of rebranding and repositioning recordkeeping in most
organizations.
This methodology for managing business information consists of
eight principal steps, as outlined in the DIRKS Manual summary. The
methodology is flexible and can be commenced at any step, depending on
what the records management program needs to achieve. According to
DIRKS, records managers need to
* Understand the business, regulatory, and social context in which
they operate (Step A)
* Identify their need to create, control, retrieve, and dispose of
records (that is, their recordkeeping requirements) through an analysis
of their business activities and environmental factors (Steps B &C)
* Assess the extent to which existing organizational strategies
(such as policies, procedures, and practices) satisfy their
recordkeeping requirements (Step D)
* Redesign existing strategies or design new strategies to address
unmet or poorly satisfied requirements (Steps E & F)
* Implement, maintain, and review these strategies
Getting Started with DIRKS
Steps A to C are of most interest to organizations. Before
beginning the DIRKS implementation, companies should:
* Prepare a business case to address the needs of the DIRKS program
as well as the expected costs and benefits. Implementing the standard
cannot be undertaken during the normal, day-to-day operations of a
records management business unit, and extra resources will be required.
The business case must be thoroughly researched and the resource issues
addressed realistically.
* When approval has been granted, gain the support of the
organization's executive or management. Address the executive
meeting or conduct a briefing session for managers and extol the
benefits of having an organization that complies with ISO 15489.
Describe the DIRKS process and establish what assistance and support is
required from managers and staff.
* Identify key personnel who possess the corporate knowledge and
will be able to coherently describe the operational activities and
processes. They will need to be consulted in data collection interviews.
Step A: The Preliminary Investigation
The purpose of Step A is to investigate, document, and understand
the essence of the organization (i.e., its structure, its business and
operations, the regulatory, social, and political environments within
which it operates, and major factors affecting recordkeeping practices).
This step is relatively straightforward and involves activities such as
researching the agency's website, annual reports, and consultations
with managers. The scope of the project may include a variety of
internal stakeholders. The following also must be identified:
* The organization's administrative context, including history
and organization structure: MI business areas and boards, authorities,
and sub-agencies are ascertained to decide which will be included in the
project scope.
* The relevant legal and regulatory framework(s): The legislation
and standards will be analyzed in subsequent steps to establish
functions and activities and develop recordkeeping requirements.
* The business context, including external stakeholders
* The corporate culture
* Compliance and risk management programs
* Recordkeeping practices and technological capabilities
Step A can be documented on a template or Word document and
submitted to management for review and approval. The time period for
compiling Step A depends on the size and complexity of the organization,
but allowing 1 to 3 months is reasonable.
This preliminary investigation results in defining the
project's scope, identifying the regulatory framework, and gaining
a comprehensive understanding of the agency being established.
Step B: Business Activity Analysis
Step B is more complex and involves a functional analysis of the
organization. The process requires consultation with personnel from the
agency's various business units to identify what they do and how
they do it. It consists of:
* Collecting information from documentary sources and consultations
* Analyzing the work performed by the organization
* Identifying each business function, activity, and transaction(s)
arising from those activities
* Developing a business classification scheme based on the business
functions, activities, and transactions
* Validating the findings with senior management
At the commencement of Step B, an awareness program should be
undertaken throughout the organization. Inform personnel (via
newsletters, e-mails, and fact sheets) about ISO 15489, the DIRKS
process, the recordkeeping tools that will be produced, and how the
tools will improve the organization's records management function.
Ascertain how the records management program will improve day-to-day
work and promote the benefits during the awareness campaign.
The DIRKS project manager must be prepared for data collection
interviews. Research should be undertaken on the actions the business
area performs, obvious functions and activities identified, and
questions prepared regarding issues where further clarification may be
needed.
Various methods can be used for the data collection and
consultation process. These vary from one-on-one consultations to
workshops attended by 10-20 people from the one business area. Based on
the concept that it is easier to react to something on paper, for some
projects, draft statements of functions and activities may be created
before conducting consultations. For others, the functions and
activities will be developed during consultations. The important aspect
of this step is personal contact with the stakeholders, explaining the
DIRKS process and gaining support for it and its future phases.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Association of Records Managers &
Administrators (ARMA) Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.