Stepwise progress toward an artificial
pancreas.
by Jancin, Bruce
KEYSTONE, COLO. -- Regulatory approval of a closed-loop medical
equipment-based artificial pancreas will probably come in stages--and
the first piece to get the nod will likely be automatic shutoff of an
insulin pump in response to a continuous glucose monitor's
nighttime warning of a pending low blood sugar level, Dr. H. Peter Chase
predicted.
In early July, the Food and Drug Administration approved a 450-page
Investigational Device Exemption cowritten by Dr. Chase for study of
five potential mathematical control algorithms designed to do exactly
that.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
The project is supported by the Juvenile Diabetes Research
Foundation, which has declared the development of an artificial pancreas
to be a top priority.
"I don't think initially the FDA is going to allow
insulin to be given on the basis of continuous glucose monitor values.
So that part of the closed loop is probably 5-10 years away. But for
safety, given that there are deaths every year from hypoglycemia, I
think the FDA will allow us to turn off a pump if the sensor is giving
an alarm of a pending low, just to prevent a severe hypoglycemic episode
or death," said Dr. Chase, professor of pediatrics at the
University of Colorado, Denver.
He and his colleagues have shown that diabetic teens using an
external continuous glucose monitor (CGM) measuring interstitial glucose
often fail to respond to the sensor's nighttime alarm of a pending
low blood sugar level. They doze fight through the warning, or partially
awaken and then quickly slip back to sleep before they can take
corrective action.
In preliminary studies conducted in 42 patients in Denver and at
Stanford (Calif.) University, the investigators have shown that
programming a pump to turn off for 90 minutes in response to a CGM alarm
of a pending low enables 80% of hypoglycemic episodes to be avoided.
Reassuringly, patients don't become ketotic when the pump is off
for that length of time, Dr. Chase continued at a conference on the
management of diabetes in youth.
Audience members argued that it would be more physiologic to
program the pump to give a fraction of the normal insulin dose in
response to a pending low, rather than shutting the pump down
altogether. Dr. Chase agreed, but noted that FDA approval of the
Investigational Device Exemption for temporary pump shutdown required
exhaustive documentation running to 450 pages.
"If you want to talk about also having the pump deliver 10% or
50% of the normal insulin, you're up to around 1,300 pages.
We're going to have to look at one thing at a time, but eventually
we'll get there," he said.
Diabetes experts are eagerly anticipating the development of a safe
and reliable artificial pancreas featuring auto control of the external
insulin pump in response to real-time CGM data. They expect that closing
the loop and removing the human factor will result in greatly improved
blood glucose control and a resultant marked reduction in the major
long-term complications of diabetes, along with a new sense of freedom
for patients because of their lessened disease-management burden.
Although the artificial pancreas is more realistic than islet cell
transplantation--with its attendant immunosuppressive therapy--as a
solution to the traditional problems of diabetes management,
improvements in CGM technology will be a prerequisite, Dr. Chase
stressed. Sensor accuracy needs to be boosted. And the CGM calibration
process must be simplified; patients now have to perform a finger-stick
blood glucose test several times per day to reset the sensor or else
risk getting misleading results.
"CGM is a work in progress," he asserted. "It can
add a lot, and yet today we're not anywhere near where we are in
terms of blood glucose monitoring and other aspects of diabetes
care."
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
Another speaker, Dr. Marian Rewers, forecast that creation of a
true closed-loop artificial pancreas is going to take longer than many
observers have hoped. That's because it will likely require
development of a glucagon-releasing system functioning akin to the
pancreatic alpha cell, in addition to insulin release in response to CGM
data.
"What we are now trying to accomplish is an artificial beta
cell, not an artificial pancreas," he said. "People without
diabetes can control blood glucose levels so tightly because we have
both beta and alpha cells working on it. I think we'll see more
development in terms of adding glucagon, perhaps in a dual-channel pump
approach.
"This will be needed for two reasons: to improve the first
phase of insulin secretion and to protect patients from postprandial
hypoglycemia," continued Dr. Rewers, who is a professor of
pediatrics and preventive medicine at the University of Colorado,
Denver, and clinical director of the university's Barbara Davis
Center for Childhood Diabetes, which cosponsored the conference along
with the Children's Diabetes Foundation at Denver and the
university.
Considerable excitement at the meeting surrounded a recently
published pilot study comparing a fully automated closed-loop insulin
delivery system to a semiautomated one. The Yale University study
involved 17 adolescent pump and CGM users with well-controlled type 1
diabetes who were assigned to 24 hours of either fully closed-loop blood
glucose control or semiautomated hybrid control, which involved auto
control supplemented by small manual priming insulin boluses given 15
minutes before meals in order to improve postprandial glycemic
excursions.
The fully closed-loop artificial pancreas proved "feasible and
remarkably effective," and the hybrid approach was even more so,
according to the investigators (Diabetes Care 2008;31:934-9).
Of all CGM glucose measurements, 85% were in the target 70-180
mg/dL range during fully closed-loop therapy, compared with just 58%
obtained during standard open-loop pump therapy.
But peak postprandial glucose levels averaged 194 mg/dL in the
group receiving small manual priming insulin boluses, significantly
better than the 226 mg/dL with the fully closed loop.
BY BRUCE JANCIN
Denver Bureau
COPYRIGHT 2008 International Medical News
Group Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.