WASHINGTON -- The public became more likely to regard alcohol
dependence as a medical illness over a 10-year period, but
stigmatization of alcoholism increased over that period as well, the
latest results of a biannual survey addressing public attitudes toward
the disorder show.
Most of the respondents who answered questions relating to
alcoholism on the 2006 General Social Survey approved of treatment from
a medical doctor (89%) or psychiatrist (81%), Marilyn Sinkewicz, Ph.D.,
reported at a joint meeting sponsored by the Research Society on
Alcoholism and the International Society for Biomedical Research on
Alcoholism. However, only about half (54%) endorsed prescription
medication for treatment.
In comparison, on the 1996 survey, 76% endorsed treatment from a
medical doctor, 67% endorsed treatment from a psychiatrist, and 41%
endorsed the use of prescription medications. These differences were
statistically significant.
The General Social Survey is administered biannually to a
nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized adults in the
United States. In 1996 and 2006, the General Social Survey incorporated
a set of vignettes describing individuals who meet the criteria for
DSM-IV alcohol dependence and other mental illnesses.
Questions probed the participants' conceptions of alcohol
dependence, stigmatization of alcohol dependence, and beliefs about
treatment for alcohol dependence. The sex, ethnicity, and education
level of the individual described in the vignettes were randomly varied.
For the 2006 survey, demographic data were available for 377
participants. Roughly half were female (55%), and most were white (71%).
Most had at least a high school education (83%). Almost all (98%)
identified the subject of the vignette as being alcohol dependent. In
1996, 48% identified the subject as being alcohol dependent. In
contrast, only half (52%) identified the subject as having a mental
illness. A comparable percentage (51%) identified the subject as having
a nervous breakdown or (52%) a physical illness.
In general, respondents thought that alcohol dependence was a
serious problem. However, researchers found a statistically significant
difference based on ethnicity: Eighty-three percent of white respondents
considered alcohol dependence a very serious problem, compared with 90%
of nonwhite respondents.
The researchers also asked about perceived causes of alcohol
dependence. Respondents were allowed to select more than one from a list
of possible causes. "The vast majority of respondents believe that
alcohol dependence is stress," said Dr. Sinkewicz, a postdoctoral
research fellow in epidemiology at Columbia University, New York. Stress
was the most commonly cited cause (92%), followed by genetics (71%),
chemical imbalance (70%), upbringing (70%), and a bad character (67%).
These perceptions of cause have changed over time. In 1996, 65% of
respondents indicated that chemical imbalances cause alcohol dependence,
62% cited genetic factors, 68% cited upbringing, and 52% cited a
person's bad character. Interestingly, while the percentage of
respondents who named these as possible causes increased for all four,
the only statistically significant difference was for bad character.
"The most disparate--15 percentage points--and only statistically
significant change was in the public's view that the cause of
alcohol dependence is the afflicted person's own bad
character."
The researchers also looked at social distance--the willingness of
respondents to interact with a person with alcohol dependence. They
found that 63% were willing to befriend someone with alcohol dependence.
In addition, 61% were willing to live near someone dependent on alcohol,
46% were willing to be social, 25% were willing to work closely, and 20%
were willing to have an alcohol dependent person marry into their
family.
"I think the take-away message here really is that more
interaction was endorsed when it involved looser social bonds but less
interaction was endorsed when it involved closer social bonds," she
said.
They also looked at the extent to which the public is willing to
endorse negative stereotypes of alcohol-dependent people. About half
believed that alcohol-dependent individuals are competent to make
decisions about treatment (55%) or money (44%). The public was much more
likely to believe that people who are dependent on alcohol are violent
to others (69%) or to themselves (83%).
In term of treatment, only 13% believed that an alcohol-dependent
person can recover on their own, while almost all (98%) believed that
recovery was possible with therapy. In terms of coercive treatment, 38%
endorsed mandatory medical treatment of alcohol-dependent individuals.
Almost all (90%) thought that forced hospitalization was appropriate if
the individual was perceived as dangerous.
In 2006, 79% believed that the government should be responsible for
providing care for alcohol-dependent individuals. In addition, 51%
believed that government insurance should be primarily responsible for
this care. Less than half (42%) thought the government should spend more
on this care. In 1996, 79% believed that the government should be
responsible for the provision of care for alcohol-dependent individuals.
In addition, 40% believed that government insurance should be primarily
responsible for this care. About half (51%) thought that the government
should spend more on such care.
BY KERRI WACHTER
Senior Writer
COPYRIGHT 2008 International Medical News
Group Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.