The data were subjected to three different statistical tests.
First, the data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance
(MANOVA) to assess the overall effect of sales management position (or
level) on all eleven role orientation dimensions. This analysis yielded
a statistically significant result (Wilks' lambda F-value = 2.73, p
[less than] .001). Thus, hierarchical position has an overall impact on
the matrix of role orientation variables considered in the study.
Second, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was conducted to discern
whether the perceptions of each of the role orientation dimensions were
influenced by sales management position (lower-, intermediate, and
upper-level). Respondent education level, income, and job tenure as a
sales manager were treated as covariates. These three variables were
selected as covariates because prior work has found that each is related
to sales organization members' perceptions of the job (see review
by Comer and Dubinsky, 1985).
Third, Scheffe (1959) contrasts were computed on those role
orientation dimensions evidencing an overall significant
management-level effect. These were calculated to ascertain whether
there were any significant differences in the role orientation
dimensions between each pair of sales management levels.
Findings
The mean, standard deviation, and ranking (based on the mean score)
for each of the sales manager role orientation dimensions for the
overall sample and for each sales management level, as well the results
for ANCOVA and Scheffe tests, are presented in Table 2. The findings are
arranged in descending order based on the overall sample's mean
score of the role orientation dimensions.
Results for the Overall Sample
As reported in Table 2, respondents strongly perceive (mean scores
are above 5 on a 7-point scale) that sales managers should have the
ability to lead subordinate salespeople, motivate salespersons,
integrate sales and marketing, and train salespeople. They should also
have a profit focus, a cost focus, and good communication skills.
Although these dimensions vary in their rankings, the results suggest
that responding sales managers consider these eight tasks central to
their job. There was, though, a lower level of agreement (mean scores
are below 5 on a 7-point scale) that sales managers should have been
successful salespersons, have an extraverted personality, or continue to
sell to large accounts. Thus, these three role orientation dimensions
are perceived to be of lesser concern to sales managers when compared
with the other eight.
Results for Lower-Level Managers
As shown in Table 2, results reveal that lower-level sales managers
strongly believe that sales managers should have the ability to lead,
motivate, and train subordinate salespeople; the ability to integrate
sales and marketing; good communication skills; and a sales focus, a
profit focus, and a cost focus (mean scores are above 5 on a 7-point
scale). This group feels less strongly, however, that sales managers
should have been successful salespersons, have an extraverted
personality, or continue to sell to large accounts.
Results for Intermediate-Level Managers
Intermediate-level sales managers perceive that the important
aspects of their jobs (mean scores are above 5 on a 7-point scale)
should involve the following: the ability to lead, motivate, and train
subordinate salespeople; the ability to integrate sales and marketing;
good communication skills; and a sales focus, a profit focus, and a cost
focus (Table 2). This group does not strongly believe, though, that
sales managers should have been successful salespersons, have an
extraverted personality, or continue to sell to large accounts.
Results for Upper-Level Managers
Upper-level sales managers strongly perceive (mean scores are above
5 on a 7-point scale) that the following role orientation dimensions are
important for sales managers: the ability to lead, motivate, and train
subordinate salespeople; the ability to integrate sales and marketing;
good communication skills; and a sales focus, a profit focus, and a cost
focus (Table 2). The remaining three role orientation dimensions-having
been a successful salesperson, having an extraverted personality, and
continuing to sell to large accounts-are perceived to be of lesser
concern to this group of sales managers.
ANCOVA Results
In assessing the influence of the overall impact of sales
management level on each of the role orientation dimensions, the ANCOVA
findings reveal that seven of the eleven items exhibit statistically
significant differences (p [less than] .05) (see Table 2). More
specifically, sales manager hierarchi cal level is related to
perceptions concerning the ability to lead subordinate salespeople, the
ability to motivate salespersons, the ability to integrate sales and
marketing, having a sales focus, the ability to train new salespersons,
having a profit focus, and having a cost focus. The perceptions of the
other four role orientation dimensions-communication skills, having been
a successful salesperson, having an extraverted personality, and
continuing to personally sell to a few accounts-evidently are not
affected by sales manager level.
Scheffe Test Results
Scheffe (1959) tests for contrasts between pairs of each sales
management group's perceptions of the foregoing seven significant
role orientation dimensions were also conducted. As presented in Table
2, ten significant contrasts (p less than] .05) were found. Upper-level
sales managers feel more strongly than their intermediate-level
counterparts that sales managers should have the ability to lead
subordinate salespeople, to motivate salespersons, and to integrate
sales and marketing. In addition, relative to lower-level sales
managers, upper-level sales managers believe more strongly that sales
managers should have the ability to train new salespeople and have a
sales focus, a cost focus, and a profit focus. Intermediate-level sales
managers perceive more strongly than do their lower-level counterparts
that sales managers should have the ability to train new salespersons
and have a sales focus and a profit focus.
Discussion
The empirical findings of the study suggest that hierarchical level
has a statistically significant effect on role orientation perceptions
of sales managers. More specifically, as incumbents ascend the sales
management hierarchy, their perceptions of what the position should
entail changes. Essentially, as sales managers move up the
organizational hierarchy to more senior management positions, their
perceived orientation seemingly changes to placing greater importance on
achieving superior economic performance for their firms. The findings
imply that the more senior the hierarchical position that a sales
manager assumes, the greater the need to focus on attaining economic
objectives.
Four role orientation dimensions (communication skills, having been
a successful salesperson, having an extraverted personality, and
continuing to personally sell to large accounts) did not appear to be
influenced by sales manager level. This may indicate that, irrespective
of hierarchical level, these role orientation dimensions are perceived
by sales managers to be seemingly "part and parcel"
manifestations of their jobs. In other words, the results imply that
sales managers uniformly consider the importance of these factors
relatively comparable vis-a-vis their jobs irrespective of hierarchical
level.
Other findings suggest that there is some consistency regarding the
rating (and ranking) of seven of the eleven role orientation dimensions.
In fact, seven role orientation dimensions had identical rankings (based
on mean scores) across all three sales manager levels: (1) the ability
to lead subordinate salespeople, (2) the ability to train new
salespersons, (3) having a profit focus, (4) having a cost focus, (5)
having been a successful salesperson, (6) having an extraverted
personality, and (7) continuing to personally sell to large accounts.
Additionally, the finding with respect to sales managers
"continuing to personally sell to large accounts" was not
significantly associated with managerial level. Nonetheless, an
examination of the direction of the mean values indicates that
lower-level sales managers perceive that personal selling is an
important task; however, as the management levels get progressively
higher, its perceived importance appears to diminish. Thus, lower-level
sales managers seemingly view their primary job as that of a "super
salesperson"; that is, they believe corporate management still
expects them to continue to sell instead of simply making the transition
to leading, managing, controlling, and directing their respective
salesforces.
Managerial Implications
Several sales management implications can be gleaned from this
study. First and foremost, the results clearly demonstrate sales
managers perceive that, as they move up the organizational hierarchy,
their job becomes more diverse and distinctly different from that
performed at lower sales management levels. More specifically, sales
managers at upper levels evidently believe that they should be focusing
on integrating sales with other marketing functions. Furthermore, senior
sales managers perceive that their jobs require participating in
devising and attaining strategic marketing objectives and having an
economic (sales, cost, and profit) orientation.
COPYRIGHT 1999 Pittsburg State University -
Department of Economics Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 1999, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.