Radio has often been considered one of the most personal media.
Because of its power to befriend, it is viewed by advertisers as an
indispensable bridge between businesses and consumers (Vaccaro, 1996).
The term "promotion" broadly refers to activities associated
with that function. According to Warner & Buchman (1993), the
purpose of promotion is "to create excitement and increased
awareness for a product or service and to get consumers involved with a
product" (p.261). A common radio station promotional activity is
the scheduling of what are referred to as radio remotes, or simply,
remotes.
The remote is often used to encourage people to go to a business.
Remotes are typically contracted and arranged through the sales
department, set up with the help of engineering, and executed and
performed by staff from the programming department. Therefore, the
remote represents an activity that brings virtually all aspects of a
radio station staff together. In practice, a radio remote entails radio
station staff personally going to the business site for a set amount of
time, and performing in an agreed upon manner. The station personnel may
go on the air to discuss the business, make pitches for listeners to
visit the business, and include various prizes and/or giveaway items to
those listeners who show up.
Retailers and media buyers often request radio stations to include
a "remote" broadcast as part of an advertising schedule. Many
stations offer a remote with marketing proposals as a promotional tool.
According to the Radio Advertising Bureau (RAB), radio has "the
ability to create custom traffic-building vehicles such as remote
broadcasts, consumer contests, and special events that result, not only
in more shoppers, but also more sales" (Ad Answers, p.7). Local
retailers expect a remote to generate traffic and increase sales from a
pool of station listeners.
There are two broad categories of radio remotes, but both may
accomplish the same goals. The sales remote is commonly scheduled with
businesses and is primarily aimed at generating revenue for the client.
The primary goal of a promotional remote is to generate traffic and
interest in the radio station and its sponsors. Promotional remotes are
common to holiday celebrations, parties, and non profit organizations.
It is important to note that there is tremendous overlap in the goals
and practices of these remotes. Sales remotes may also generate traffic
and interest, and promotional remotes may also feature sales
opportunities that generate revenue.
The radio remote has been a staple of local radio sales efforts for
a number of years, but seems to have so far escaped scientific scrutiny.
Renn-Scanlan (1998) compiled a listing of 42 radio-related theses and
dissertations from 1995 to 1997, and although each one investigated an
important aspect of radio, none of them included discussion of the radio
remote. A similar search of related textbooks finds only the briefest
mentions of remotes (primarily as part of a list of "added
value" one can get from radio advertising). One textbook (Radio
Station Operations, by O'Donnell, Hausman, & Benoit, 1989)
offers this account:
Promotional remotes not only are often part of a direct-sales campaign but
also are used strictly for promotion. Remotes combine on-air
promotion--bolstering the station's image in the minds of listeners--with
off-air promotion--being visible to people attending the event where the
remote is located. Promotional remotes often are staged at fairs and public
service events. Be aware that remotes take much work and involve frequent
technical problems. (p.215).
Despite the absence of scholarly work on the radio remote, it
should be considered for study because it is perhaps the only activity
where the audience, the radio station staff, and the business client are
all physically together, in one place, at one time. This unique aspect
of radio deserves consideration because it applies to the study of
audiences, programming, management, sales, marketing, promotion, and
even engineering. These relationships between the business, the radio
station, and the audience neatly fit into the model proposed a
generation ago by Westley & MacLean (1957). Message senders
(businesses) use radio to reach their target audience. To keep the
system in relative balance, both the business and the radio station need
feedback from receivers (the audience) as a self-righting mechanism. The
remote fulfills the role of feedback loop for both the business and the
radio station.
This suggests that the radio remote may provide a clearer picture
of audience and business perceptions of radio. McQuail (1997) suggests
that institutional forms of feedback may be inadequate because their
structured nature may be intimidating to audience members, making them
reluctant to express their views and feelings. In addition, Webster
& Phalen (1997) suggest that, to best understand audience members
(individuals), one should observe them as they experience media in a
cultural context. The radio remote is an ideal mechanism for studying
audiences because it is a relatively relaxed group activity which
invites direct audience feedback--a place where they can meet the staff
as well as sample the retailer's wares.
Therefore, studying the radio remote helps us understand the role
radio stations play in modern society. The remote is an event that
actively links radio station operations to both retailers and the
audience. It is perhaps the one activity where the station, the
audience, and business clients actually all come together and meet
face-to-face. The role of the remote--as well as how it is perceived by
audiences, radio stations, and business clients--must be investigated in
order to better understand those conditions that result in successful
radio remotes.
Research Questions
This study proposed to collect and examine the perceptions of
radio's three most important constituents regarding the radio
remote event. These are (1) the stations' personnel that execute
and use the remote as a marketing tool; (2) the businesses that often
request the remote in addition to an advertising schedule; and (3) the
listeners who are active enough or ego-involved enough to attend the
remote in person.
The research questions sought to identify dominant perceptions of
remotes as well as to obtain specific information regarding practices.
a. What types of features are common to radio station remotes?
b. How does a client determine whether a remote has been
successful?
c. How does a radio station determine whether a remote has been
successful?
d. What perceptions about successful remotes are shared by the
client and the station?
e. What type of person attends the radio remote?
f. What factors result in the person attending the remote?
Method
As a first look into radio station remote broadcasts, this study
brought a variety of exploratory methods to the analysis of the
effectiveness of radio remotes, rather than relying on what might be
used in more typical social science research. For the key radio station
and business components, a structured interview was used rather than the
more standard fixed response survey format. Structured interviewing is
designed to allow for greater input from respondents and to allow the
further exploration and development of raised issues and comments.
Structured interviewing also generally permits the gathering of more
complete information and a fuller "picture" of the phenomenon
under study than is permitted by more traditional survey techniques. We
also sought to use a form of ethnographic research by going to a range
of radio remote broadcasts, observing events and talking to people.
Traditional survey techniques were used with audience members, but field
researchers also talked more informally with radio station personnel at
the event, and with the businesses involved. From this variety of
methods we sought to examine attitudes about radio remotes and the
effectiveness thereof from a number of perspectives: Station management,
station personnel at the events, businesses using remotes, audience
members/customers at remotes, and from our own observation of live radio
remotes.
The exploratory nature of this study suggested the use of a
stratified convenience sample of markets, rather than the more
traditional random sample. This led to the selection of one large, two
medium, and two small markets for study. There were three reasons for
this decision. First, this was conceived as an exploratory study that
sought to identify factors influencing the use and effectiveness of
radio station remotes. Therefore, the focus was on the events
themselves, rather than on a need to extrapolate results to a larger
population of markets. Second, time and monetary constraints limited the
ability of the researchers to examine a large number of geographically
diverse markets or a random selection of radio remotes, much less
randomly select from the population at large to find radio remote
patrons. Therefore, the choice was made to visit as many radio remotes
in as many markets as possible during the time allotted. Finally, the
choice of markets was guided by the contacts that members of the
research team had in the selected markets. Because of the sensitive
nature of station-client sales relationships, it was believed that
contact made by someone familiar with that market would improve the
likelihood of station cooperation. Station cooperation would facilitate
data collection from business clients.
COPYRIGHT 2000 Broadcast Education
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.