Put "global" in front of some words and the connection
makes sense: global economy, global capital markets, global
entertainment, or global sports. As for a global real estate market, it
hasn't arrived--yet. What exists is mostly a patchwork of national
real estate markets, some similar, but most strikingly different. The
first guiding principle for real estate owners, investors and users is:
"there is no global real estate market per se."
If a seamless, integrated global real estate market does not yet
exist, it is not due to a lack of interest on the part of corporations,
businesses, and other users of space, nor indifference on the part of
real estate investors and owners. Companies see globalization as a means
to find new markets, move closer to customers, and reduce manufacturing
and other costs. Investors, too, are looking beyond their own borders,
in part because some home markets are too small or too competitive and
do not offer many investment opportunities. Investors are trying to
realize higher returns by taking advantage of inefficiencies or unique
opportunities in local markets, while owners are seeking to expand their
existing portfolios of assets and build on the success of their domestic
businesses.
Globalization offers these parties increased exposure to markets,
more investment choices, access to global capital markets, and
additional opportunities to increase deal flow to achieve greater
geographic diversification, reduce dependence on a single market, and
smooth or increase portfolio returns. For the host country, global
investment means increased domestic employment, greater access to
international capital to finance growth and compete internationally,
access to global technologies, and other benefits.
In the global environment, the key to success for owners, investors
and users of real estate is to really understand local real estate
markets. Whether the/re investing billions around the planet, or
millions in a few countries, owners, investors and users should have a
thorough knowledge of the markets in which they choose to invest or
operate. They should know these markets as well as their home markets.
Even sophisticated real estate professionals can make the mistake
of taking their knowledge of their home real estate markets and trying
to apply it to other markets. But what's true in one market is not
necessarily true in another. International best practices are developing
but are not universally accepted and almost always have national twists.
Often, these best practices are adapted to local traditions, cultures,
and politics. As a result, every market has a unique set of obstacles or
barriers to entry that, depending on one's viewpoint, can be
pitfalls or opportunities; for example, laws favoring tenant rights may
be an obstacle to investors and owners but an opportunity for
multinational companies and businesses. The key is to recognize these
obstacles or opportunities, consider the options for dealing with them,
and develop strategies to mitigate or exploit them. To deal with
barriers to entry and other issues, owners, investors, and users often
utilize impartial, reputable local real estate resources, including
accounting and tax advisors, attorneys, consultants, brokers, and
capital partners.
Despite international efforts to reduce barriers to foreign
investment, foreign ownership of real estate in many countries is often
subject to specific domestic restrictions and prohibitions, and global
investors often utilize specially tailored ownership structures to
mitigate such restrictions. In Mexico, for example, direct ownership of
real estate by a foreign individual or entity is prohibited within 100
kilometers of the border and within 50 kilometers of the coastline. A
foreign-owned Mexican company, however, may acquire trust rights to real
estate through the creation of a trust with a Mexican bank as trustee.
Real estate markets slowly but surely are moving toward
globalization by removing barriers to entry, adopting global real estate
standards, and developing the legal and professional infrastructure
needed to attract companies, businesses and investment capital. Global
investors, owners, and users are helping to drive this process by
generally taking a consistent approach and using the same methodologies,
valuation techniques, tax analysis, limited liability structures,
metrics, and models to invest in or acquire properties or do business
from market to market. The key to successful offshore investing is to
make the right contacts with reputable local partners and local
accounting, tax, legal, and other service providers, and to carefully
develop the most efficient structures that limit investor liability and
minimize foreign taxes and withholding obligations.
The Czech Republic is an example of a country that has made
structural changes in its economy, including development of a private
real estate market, to attract businesses and real estate investors from
all over the world. Depending upon their risk, tax, and capitalization
requirements, global investors in the Czech Republic can choose from a
variety of ownership vehicles, including limited partnerships, limited
liability companies, and joint stock companies. Lease provisions are
fully negotiable and enforceable and real estate mortgages are common.
Countries differ considerably in their approaches to lease law and
tenant rights. Many have established leasing guidelines that favor the
tenant's rights over the landlord's. Although many countries
limit such rights to residential real estate, a number have extended
similar rights to commercial properties. Furthermore, tenant rights
often vary by product type within a country.
In Brazil, early lease termination and automatic renewal rights are
common in commercial leases. Leases are for a minimum term of 36 months,
but tenants have the right to terminate a lease with one month's
notice regardless of the contractual expiration date. Once a tenant has
occupied the premises for more than five years, that tenant has the
right to continue to occupy the space for a minimum of one month per
year of occupancy. For multinational companies and other global users,
tenant rights can be an advantage; however, for real estate owners and
investors, tenant rights present a number of risks, the most important
being the disruption of cash flows. There may be ways for owners to at
least partly mitigate these risks, such as requiring tenants to pay
higher security deposits.
One of the most common ways in which countries are lowering
investment barriers is through international tax treaties, which are
being changed to reduce foreign investor withholding taxes or double
taxation of income or to achieve other tax-reduction measures. The
structure adopted for the acquisition of direct or indirect interests in
real estate outside the investor's country of residence almost
always controls the extent of taxability of the profits, and the use of
tax losses and deductions, from the investment. Depending on the
countries involved, the use of tax haven entities can be beneficial or a
disaster. The ownership and tax structure planning process must take
into account the particular circumstances of the investor (for example,
the investor's resident jurisdiction, whether the investor includes
tax-exempt or pass-through entities or real estate investment trusts
(REITs), and the investor's individual tax attributes).
Even with tax treaties in place, the issue of local taxation is a
constant vexation for owners and investors. Property, income, and
capital gains tax vary widely from country to country and sales and
transfer taxes such as Value Added Tax (VAT) further complicate both the
structural and fiscal position of offshore investments. In the area of
taxation, as in so many other areas concerning overseas investment,
there is no substitute for local knowledge.
The issue of how and where to finance real estate is also
problematic for owners, investors and users. Most real estate markets
provide some form of leveraged real estate financing. First, mortgages
are the most established form. Also common are varying forms of second
mortgage or mezzanine financing. In these countries, international real
estate capital providers such as pension and opportunity funds are often
the primary sources of mezzanine capital. In countries without an
existing market for mezzanine financing, the legal infrastructure is
usually sufficient to support such financing. Complex equity structures
are also common. Large-scale real estate developments and trophy
property acquisitions often lead the market with sophisticated deal
structures that are designed to meet the respective needs of their
investors. In some countries, complex equity structures are tailored to
address market-specific issues.
In Argentina, for example, most commercial real estate transactions
are made on a 100% equity basis. While commercial mortgages exist,
Argentine investors generally favor increasing their equity stakes or
utilizing preferred equity partners to borrowing from Argentine banks.
When such partners are used, preferred, and subordinated equity
structures in Argentina simulate conventional first mortgage financing
and offer leveraged returns to subordinated equity holders.
CONCLUSION
COPYRIGHT 2002 The Counselors of Real
Estate Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.