Executive Summary. The present study examines the impact of the
Internet on the real estate office market through a survey of real
estate professionals in traditional companies in Boston/U.S. and
London/U.K. This survey captures professionals' opinions on the use
of the Internet and how it affects their business. The results from both
cities indicate differences when using the Internet versus traditional
practice. The Internet seems to affect the role of the transaction
participants, the length of the process but not the participants'
earnings or transaction steps. It is currently used as a listing
service, information-gathering resource and communication tool.
INTRODUCTION
The Internet is a recent expanding medium of economic and social
exchange. It is most effective at breaking down barriers, improving
information flow, and speeding up the decision-making processes (Hartung
C.J., et al., March 2000). Two factors significantly contributed to the
increase in Internet adoption among real estate brokerage companies:
increased computer use throughout the population as well as companies,
and the downturn in commercial real estate. This downturn led brokerage
companies to list properties online to reach a wider market (Rebuz.com,
8/8/01). Similar to the retail industry and Web-based marketing (Baen
J., 2000; Miller N., 2000) the real estate industry is expanding its
online listings by continuously advertising additional properties, thus
providing property seekers with a variety of options.
The Internet use in the U.S. and the U.K. can provide a context of
the Internet's adoption in the two countries where the survey took
place. Nielsen/Net Ratings estimated that more than 62% of the U.S.
population had Internet access in 2001 either at home or at work in
comparison with 57% the year before (Stellin S., 2001). According to the
U.S. Department of Commerce, in 2000 51% of all U.S. homes had a
computer and 41.5% had Internet access. High per-minute charges have
prevented people in the U.K. and other European countries from browsing
the Internet, leading to a lower growth than in U.S. (Wickham R., 2000).
In the U.K., household PC penetration was 46% (Nielsen, 2001). The U.K.
government's E-envoy indicated that Internet penetration in the
United Kingdom was still less than 60% (Holmes M., 2001). The housing
market transactions have been more easily facilitated through the
Internet compared to office transactions. Studies in the U.S. show that
the numbers of homebuyers searching for housing on the Int ernet are
between 40% [Forrester research, 2000; Farnsworth C. & Evans B.,
2000] and 56% (Murray M., 2000). In general 79% of agents claim they do
not think the Internet threatens their job (Gomez Research, 2000).
However, the search for housing in the U.K. is mostly conducted through
traditional methods because of limited Internet use.
This study was motivated by the limited research on the
Internet's impact on the Real Estate Office Market (REOM). A survey
of traditional real estate companies was conducted in Boston and London
in order to capture the "real-world" views on Internet
adaptation and especially its impact on the office properties
transaction process. Boston was selected because of its small office
market size compared to other major cities in the northeast U.S. and
what brokers see as a tight, relationship-driven office market. London,
however, was selected because it is the largest and most representative
office market throughout U.K. What could the survey results indicate for
these cities in two continents? This survey tries to identify how
Internet use affects the role, time, and earnings of the key
participants involved in the transaction process of office properties as
well as the transaction process length. This survey of traditional real
estate companies in Boston and London indicates that the Internet
affects the roles of the transaction participants allowing the real
estate business to remain competitive.
LITERATURE REVIEW
The traditional real estate industry has been characterized as
fragmented and technophobic (Hartung C.J., et al., 2000). A recent
literature review (Dermisi S., 2002) shows that although the Internet
Real Estate has made significant steps in its advertisement side, the
transaction process has not shared the same growth. Adaptation of the
Internet, as a new medium in a traditional "relationship
driven" sector, was slow in the mid-1990s but has increased
exponentially in the past few years (Baen J., and Guttery R., 1997).
From the 1995 onwards, real estate Web sites evolved from static
brochures to comprehensive online property listing sites with various
information on the property, location, demographics, and statistics for
the area and finally to process management sites that create
efficiencies in the workflow process along with providing information
(Harvard Design School, 2000; Bond M., Seiler M., Seiler V., Blake B,
2000).
As in other industries, views vary on the Internet's use and
impact on the real estate sector. Some real estate professionals
believed that traditional real estate companies could not easily adopt
the Internet. Others argued that "in the new information technology
paradigm of place and space, the classic location, location, location
mantra of real estate decision-making is replaced by information,
communication, location" (Roulac S.. 1996). In recent years another
thought has been that "although real estate is not very
technology-oriented, people are beginning to appreciate that technology
can be relationship-oriented" (Pike P., 1998). The relationship
between brokers and the Internet is not mutually exclusive, but allows
technology to complement them in order to produce more valuable services
(Devine A., 2001). Bond M., et. al. (2000) reported that most of the
firms they surveyed either operate their own Web sites or list their
properties on larger industry sites. While the Internet cannot replace
relationsh ips, brokers' roles will likely be redefined as more
emphasis is placed on financial and analytic services (Hartung C.J., et
al., 2000). Brokers and clients still need to communicate but they are
meeting face to face less and "talking" electronically more.
Brokerages must distinguish themselves in other ways mainly by their
ability to help companies make increasingly complex decisions about real
estate (Moore P., 1999).
In the real estate business using a common online platform that
functions as a repository for documents and information is a vital first
step toward simplifying the complex transaction process (Carpenter S.,
2000). The combination of commercial real estate's limited
transparency and information sharing as well as the variety of deal
clauses are significant obstacles to the use of a common standardized
platform (Miles M., 2000; Bergsman S., 2001). Consortia, like
Constellation and Octane, have been formed to overcome these obstacles.
Although it is cheaper and more flexible for consortia to merge with
other companies, the challenge is to pool all listings together in a
comprehensive and meaningful way on a neutral platform for all players
(Harvard Design School, 2000; Bergsman 5., 2001). Along with consortia,
portals have begun to evolve presenting a new medium for possible future
transactions. The portal evolution has led to trends that consolidate
and globalize existing markets by developing a comprehensive procurement
platform service, enabling business practices (Harvard Design School,
2000).
DATA COLLECTION
The real estate data were obtained in 2001 from a survey of
companies in the U.S. and London/U.K. chosen to meet the following
criteria: a) national coverage in terms of listings as a real estate
agency; b) largest real estate companies in Boston and London in terms
of broker numbers; and c) well-established research and investment
departments. The population (all companies meeting the criteria) was
determined through the Internet, financial/consulting organizations,
local chambers of commerce and real estate organizations such as BOMA
and NARET. This search led to the conclusion that the Boston population
consisted of ten real estate companies: CB Richard Ellis, Spaulding
& Sluye (Colliers), Prudential, Jones Lang Lasalle, Cushman &
Wakefield, Grubb & Ellis, Insignia, Prudential, CRESA partners, and
Meredith & Graw Inc. A similar search in London revealed a
population of ten companies: DTZ, Jones Lang Lasalle, CB Hillier Parker,
Lambert Smith Hampton, Healy Baker, Henderson, Prudential, Cushman and
Wakefield , Coldwell Banker, and GVA Worldwide.
Probability sampling (DeVaus A., 1996) was selected because of its
random sampling principle in a population and its effectiveness even in
small population sizes (Lyberg L., and Kasprzyk D., 1991). Finally,
representatives from four major brokerage companies in Boston (CB
Richard Ellis, Spaulding & Slye, Prudential and Jones Lang Lasalle)
and seven in London responded to the survey (DTZ, Jones Lang Lasalle, CB
Hillier Parker, Lambert Smith Hampton, Healy Baker, Henderson, and
Prudential). All these participating companies are among the most
representative in terms of certified brokers and deals in each city,
indicating that they are very knowledgeable about both the market as
well as the best practices for a property transaction.
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
The questionnaire was designed to capture the views of real estate
professionals working in traditional companies on how and if the use of
Internet facilitates office market transactions.
COPYRIGHT 2002 The Counselors of Real
Estate Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.