Entrepreneur: Start & Grow Your Business

"Dining while black": tipping as social artifact.


by Dirks, Danielle^Rice, Stephen K.

Recent studies suggest that black American diners tend to tip less than white American diners. Rather than address tipping directly, this study uses in-depth interviews of white restaurant workers to frame the issue of how restaurant workers view and respond to customers of color. The present research indicates that white American restaurant workers actively participate in derogatory stereotyping of black American customers, engaging in the use of racial code words and derogatory ethnic labels, while discriminating--both overtly and covertly--in their service interactions with black customers. Among other things, servers attempt to negotiate with other white employees to avoid having black parties seated in their sections and actively try to trade off such "undesirable" parties. Servers' logic regarding tipping is self-perpetuating in the sense that they avoid serving parties of black customers because they anticipate poor tips. These results suggest that evidence of racial tipping differences needs to be viewed cautiously in the service context in which they exist and that the industry should take special care to ensure that when servers serve black Americans, they should provide service that justifies a good tip.

Keywords: race relations; tipping; restaurants; discrimination

**********

Recent studies posit that black American diners often leave smaller tips than do white American diners. Using in-depth interviews of white restaurant workers (who dominate front-of-the-house positions), this study frames the issue according to how restaurant workers view and respond to customers of color. The research indicates that white American restaurant workers actively participate in derogatory stereotyping of black American customers, engage in the use of racial code words and derogatory ethnic labels, and discriminate in their service interactions with black customers. Among other things, servers attempt to negotiate with other employees to avoid having black parties seated in their section and actively try to trade off such "undesirable" parties. Servers~ logic is self-perpetuating in the sense that they avoid serving parties of black customers because they anticipate poor tips from those parties. These results suggest that evidence of racial tipping differences needs to viewed cautiously in the service context.

A majority of white Americans are fond of thinking that racism is a thing of the past and that black Americans no longer face intentional or widespread discrimination. (1) While overt, aggressive, institutionalized racism has been outlawed, many black Americans believe that a different set of rules applies for blacks than what applies to whites, and they understand that racism is an integral, permanent, and indestructible component of society. (2)

The restaurant-tipping debate introduced by Michael Lynn's accompanying article demonstrates one aspect of the divide in people's beliefs about racism. (3) To summarize this article, many white servers believe that the majority of black customers tip poorly regardless of how well they are served. Lynn considers this a matter of the need to educate black American customers on current tipping practices in the United States. In this article, however, we present a different perspective--a perspective in which tips by black Americans may, in fact, correlate with the level of service they receive. Based on our research, we see restaurants as an institution plagued by racial discrimination not unlike many other American institutions, places where black Americans face continued and various forms of racism, regardless of law or official policy. Our research focuses on tipping in the broader context of restaurant race relations and offers a lens by which to view tipping in the context of racial discrimination and continued racism in restaurants.

In an effort to extend the limited empirical work that exists on black Americans' experience as restaurant customers, this study examines one exemplar of everyday racism: the spoken and unspoken and organizational rituals that govern restaurant experiences. (4) Using in-depth interviews of restaurant workers, the study examines how restaurant workers (primarily, servers) address issues of race, explains how elements of social exchange (tipping in particular) play out in the restaurant's interracial "theater," and examines the extent to which restaurant workers view their racial stereotypes as rational beliefs. We ground our study within a broader institutional context, embedding this study's data points into the broad sweep of ingrained belief systems and institutionalized restaurant practices.

Institutional Misconduct and the Black American Experience

The majority of everyday examples that we introduce in this article involve interpersonal interactions between restaurant servers and customers, fellow servers, and dining-room hosts, hostesses, and managers. But as Feagin et al., Bell, and others suggest, when one speaks of differential access or opportunity based on biology, one cannot separate the interpersonal from the structural; they are in many ways variants of the same problem. (5) It is in this vein that one must begin to understand the historical precedents that still, some argue, govern black American customer experiences in a full range of leisure and commercial establishments.

Probably the best-known case of discriminatory malfeasance in the restaurant industry involves the Shoney's Corporation, in the case of Haynes v. Shoney's. (6) In 1992, after two years of bitter court battles related to a class-action lawsuit on behalf of 21,000 persons, the Shoney's Corporation settled the Haynes case for $132.5 million, the largest such settlement in United States history. (7) As detailed in the accompanying sidebar, the lawsuit included well-established examples of overt and covert racism on the part of Ray Danner, Shoney's cofounder and chair of its board, and other senior managers. With regard to formal policies and procedures, Shoney's was also found to lack an affirmative-action plan, a formal application process, and objective criteria for promotions.

Although most observers point to Haynes v. Shoney's as the most egregious example of formalized racist practices in the restaurant industry, serious charges have also been levied against Denny's (e.g., management's often publicized use of the word blackout as a code for having too many black customers in a Denny's restaurant at one time), Red Onion, International House of Pancakes, and Domino's. Also part of the restaurant industry's sad history was the case of the Sambo's restaurant chain. This firm drew human-rights complaints in the 1970s because its name invoked the stereotype from "Little Black Sambo." Indeed, the chain used the story's cartoon-type character as a logo. (11) In short, formal complaints against U.S. restaurant chains suggest complex and persistent patterns of discrimination related to race, power, and culture.

By the Numbers

To better understand differential patterns of treatment based on race, we present the following snapshot of the black American experience within the restaurant industry, which is the largest employer of service workers, regardless of race, in the United States. The numbers suggest distinct patterns of "preferred" roles and missed opportunities. Although black workers make up one-tenth of all those employed in the United States, black Americans constitute 13 percent of those in foodservice jobs. Sixteen percent of kitchen workers and 19 percent of cooks are black, compared with only 5 percent of waiters and waitresses and less than 3 percent of bartenders. (12)

The issue extends beyond the fact that black workers are more likely to be in the back of a restaurant than in the front. Few black Americans are to be found in the ranks of the industry's management, and few black entrepreneurs have been able to secure franchises in major family-restaurant chains. Black entrepreneurs have also had difficulty obtaining bank loans to start restaurants, either on their own or as part of a franchise arrangement. (13) With this background, we turn to our examination of blacks' experience as restaurant customers.

Dining While Black

In addition to examples of racial discrimination made evident in the Denny's and Shoney's cases, many research studies on racism indicate that discrimination in restaurant dining is not uncommon for black Americans. (14) Feagin and Sikes revealed the following forms of restaurant discrimination: black Americans were slow to be greeted, were seated in undesirable locations such as next to the kitchen or outside, and were largely ignored by service-staff members while dining. (15) Researchers have suggested that these examples are extensions of Jim Crow-era denials of service (16) and typify the more subtle and intangible acts that characterize today's "modern racism." (17)

In a study focusing on the leisure-travel experiences of black Americans, Willming found that 76 percent of the 131 people she surveyed reported some form of "rejection, harassment, threats, or verbal or physical attacks simply because of race" while eating in sit-down restaurants. Furthermore, 51 percent of those surveyed reported racial discrimination in the hotel or motel restaurants they visited, and 46 percent reported perceived discrimination while dining at fast-food restaurants. (18) A 1997 Gallup poll analyzed by the Urban Institute indicated 21 percent of black Americans had encountered race-based discrimination while dining out in the previous thirty days. (19) Collectively, these reports support the colloquial term "dining while black," marked by racial discrimination that is similar to the experience of "driving while black" (being stopped and searched for spurious reasons), "shopping while black" (being harassed or followed by store employees), and "hailing (a cab) while black" (being refused ride service).

Restaurants' Regressive Racial Climate

While research on discrimination in restaurants has focused on the experiences of customers as targets of prejudice, we know of little research regarding restaurant personnel as instruments of discrimination--particularly in terms of their attitudes and actions. As we noted at the outset, much of the work on race relations and restaurant workers focuses on the practice of tipping within restaurants and how tipping practices are possibly related to restaurant workers' perceptions, attitudes, and treatment of black Americans. (20)

Servers' a priori perceptions of tipping differences have been thought to be one possible explanation for discrimination against black American customers. Those servers who believe that black Americans do not tip well may then provide inferior service to black customers, which then in turn leads to lower tips--in a self-fulfilling prophecy. (That is one thesis presented by Lynn and Thomas-Haysbert.) Potential tipping differences aside, understanding the interpersonal and organizational rituals that govern the dining experience of black Americans may help to better explain discrimination on the part of some restaurant personnel.

An examination of the tipping.org Web site reveals that restaurant workers have much to say about restaurant race relations, particularly in conjunction with tipping habits. Notable threads are posted under headings such as "Minorities Don't Tip: True or False?" and "Why Don't the Majority of Black People Tip?" Such threads draw hundreds of candid responses that allege specific tipping behavior by black Americans in comparison to white Americans, as well as additional groups of Americans of color and international diners. Many of those who write negatively about black Americans are quick to explain that they are not "racist" or "prejudiced," even though they often say things that are indeed just that. (21)

Backstage Race Talk

As the discourse at the tipping Web site suggests, many restaurant workers rely on stereotypical knowledge schemas to guide their treatment of black Americans as customers. Many of the threads focus on racial stereotypes regarding tipping behavior, the shared understanding of and language used by white American restaurant workers regarding restaurant race relations, and the justification for differential and discriminatory treatment given to black American customers. As stated above, if restaurant personnel believe that black Americans tip less and are therefore less deserving of equal service, servers may give inferior service in the first place, thus eliciting the very tipping practices they abhor. (22) Poor tips become a confirmation of the servers' personal beliefs and contribute to the shared organizational knowledge. The cycle is perpetuated when existing servers' perceptions of their experiences generate a discourse that helps to shape incoming employees' belief structures.

The self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes has been studied both cognitively (23) and through private discourse. (24) Our research here relies on private discourse, such as what one would find in the (backstage) discussions among restaurant workers. Private discourse exists with relative selectivity and is negotiated within a restaurant lexicon that involves the coding of events, people, and beliefs. Research on private discourse and racial language by van Dijk suggests that both work to shape prejudice and discrimination. (25) As Myers and Williamson's work on backstage "race talk" suggests, individuals frequently make derogatory and stereotypical remarks about black Americans through shared backstage or private discourse among other white Americans. (26)

Backstage Race Relations

The responses by restaurant personnel at the tipping Web site highlight many current themes in racial and ethnic relations. "Old-fashioned" forms of racism, involving overt discrimination and open expression of anti-black attitudes and opinions, are now being disguised in more subtle forms of "modern racism" that involve the tacit expression of a racist belief system coupled with an abating acceptance of negatively expressed attitudes. (27) Many white Americans have become quite adept at presenting themselves as nonprejudiced individuals while still harboring many racist and stereotypical notions regarding race relations and black Americans. (28)

The notion of a "frontstage" and a backstage presentation of oneself has evolved into the concept of frontstage and backstage racism. (29) Similar to the idea of "aversive racism" that characterizes "the racial attitudes of many whites who endorse egalitarian values land] who regard themselves as nonprejudiced, but who discriminate in subtle, rationalizable ways," (30) the frontstage and backstage racism framework posits that individuals are adept at negotiating a nonprejudiced and socially appropriate frontstage presentation but may be more likely to reveal an openly prejudiced and racist self in a backstage setting that serves as a "safe space" for racist sentiment and action. (31) These ideas suggest that racial attitudes have become increasingly complex and nuanced in the sense that many prejudiced individuals will outwardly agree with egalitarian social and racial norms while actively avoiding their internalization. (32)

Examining the racial language and rituals that exist as part of the "everyday" thread of race relations in the restaurant is important, as people of color are often targets of negative and prejudicial stereotypes and suffer in multiple ways from interpersonal and organizational discrimination. (33) In an attempt to understand the individual and organizational purveyors of such discrimination, this study examines white American restaurant workers' knowledge of the rituals, processes, and language that govern the hiring and dining experiences of black Americans.

Interviewing Restaurant Employees

Sixteen white restaurant workers, thirteen women and three men, were interviewed for this study. Their ages ranged from nineteen to forty-six. All participants had worked in at least one table-service, chain restaurant or were currently doing so; work experience ranged from two months to twenty-five years. Participants worked in various parts of the United States, with most working in the southeast. The majority of the participants were college educated, with approximately half working while also attending college.

Procedure. In-depth interviews were conducted with the respondents. Located through personal contacts via phone, email, or in person while dining in restaurants throughout Florida, candidates were asked whether they would be willing to participate in a study on restaurant workers and restaurant race relations. Interviews were conducted at the location, date, and time of participants' choosing--usually in their homes. Two interviews were conducted at a quiet coffee shop, and three interviews were conducted in a room reserved at a university campus. Interview lengths spanned from twenty-five to ninety minutes. Informed consent and demographic information were collected from all participants. Interviews were audiotaped and later transcribed.

Participants were asked to describe their restaurant work experience, their knowledge of discrimination policies and diversity training in their restaurant(s), information about the racial composition of employees and customers, and their knowledge or perceptions about hiring practices. Participants were asked about the interpersonal aspects of their positions including how they would describe the "racial climate" of the restaurant(s); what they thought about black Americans' reports of discrimination; their perceptions of tipping across race, class, and gender lines; whether they could recall possible race-related language or incidents; and how they felt race was handled (in a general sense) at their place(s) of employment. If a given participant had work experience at more than one restaurant, she or he was asked to describe each restaurant in separate, distinct terms. Transcribed interviews were then analyzed using a grounded-theory framework. (34)

Racial Divides in Restaurant Employment

To clearly capture the underlying interpersonal and organizational rituals and processes related to the black American restaurant experience in hiring and dining, we first present the results related to the broad business context as experienced by participants, and then we delve into the frontstage and backstage interactions that serve as the framework for understanding the individual and institutional practices that govern black Americans' experiences in restaurants.

Hiring practices at the restaurants covered by this study suggest a pattern of differential hiring practices and a form of employee "steering" toward front-of-the-house and back-of-the-house positions. Nearly all of the respondents reported that front-of-the-house positions tended to be filled by white Americans, while people of color were usually given back-of-the-house positions, especially those that offered lesser status and lower pay. In that regard, one hostess noted,

Um, it's ... predominantly white [laugh].

Everybody who works, who works at any

of the restaurants I have, like especially

server-wise has been white. Anybody of

any other ethnicity has been either in the

kitchen or um, yeah, either like a line

cook or a dishwasher.... If there is a

black person in the restaurant, urn, or

even like a Hispanic person, they'll usually

be in the kitchen.

Another hostess elaborated using front-and back-of-the-house descriptions, as follows:

I think the back of the house, the people

like the cooks and cleaners, the

majority are African American. The

front, the hostesses are all white, and

maybe there are three servers who are

black.... There's like one black manager

and five white ones. The majority

of the back of the house are African

American.

The responses of our respondents regarding their restaurants are similar to reports from other institutions where few white Americans have close, equal-status, personal contacts with people of color. (35) Many of our respondents had to pause to think of any people of color with whom they had worked. For instance, one server asked us to give her a minute to "rack her brain" as she tried to recall a single person of color with whom she worked. Another respondent, a server who had worked in a variety of front- and back-of-the-house positions in her twenty-five years of experience was shocked when she realized the following:

In fact, I don't know that I've ever

worked in a restaurant--in all the years

that I've worked--that I've worked next

to a black server! That I've ever had

that ... that I've ever even had that situation!

I can't ever remember, looking

back, that I've ever worked with a black

server! Um....

As the veteran server's account above suggests, one can work for decades in a restaurant without having the opportunity to have an equal-status contact with a person of color. When asked to reflect on that realization, this server elaborated,

I don't know! I find it bizarre! Until right

now, I guess I never really put a lot of

thought into it, but since you're asking ...

um, I would say it probably has a

lot to do with race ... that, unfortunately,

if you are black, they don't want you to

be in the service industry, where you're

out in the front of the house--on the

front lines, you know. Um, maybe they

think that the customers think that

blacks are dirty ... um, I don't know! I

don't know what the reasoning would

be, but I do ... looking back on it right

now find it pretty strange that there wasn't

more of a mixture of blacks and

whites working side by side!

Notice that this respondent quickly speculated that customers will think "blacks are dirty" and that those who do the hiring would not want black Americans in front-of-the-house positions. Not only does this reasoning involve an egregious anti-black belief, but this is known as "consumer discrimination," a form of employment discrimination in which employers hire employees based on the racial composition of their consumer base or by attempting to anticipate consumers' racial desires. (36) In particular, this type of discrimination is found to affect positions that involve direct customer contact. (37)

Although our study involved race, we found that many of the accounts given by respondents indicated that positions within the restaurant align not only by race but also by gender. Every respondent in the sample mentioned that white American males filled the management and ownership positions in the restaurant, with few people of color or women working in such positions. One server tried to recall a black manager but could not do so:

I'm trying to remember if I've ever

worked with ... a manager in a restaurant

that hasn't, that has been anything

other than white? No, in all three restaurants

I worked at, all of my managers

have, all my managers have been white

males, with the exception [that] I've had

two female managers, you know, that

have kind of come and gone, you know,

a couple months period.... Both of them

were white.

The intersection of race and gender was also prominent for the hostess position, as this server recalled that the hostess position also required a certain look to be hired:

I had one black girl that worked at the

Shrimp House, out of the two years that I

worked there, as a hostess. And the only

reason I think that she was allowed to

work there, was because she was really

cute ... and she was thin, and she was

very trendy like all the other cute little

hostess-types that they hired ... and she

was a friend of someone who knew

someone. She came with a very good

recommendation, but, um, yeah. That's

the only time! In the two years of working

there, I never worked with a black

server.

The peculiar language used by this respondent, indicating that the young hostess was "allowed" to work at the restaurant, is worth noting. Perhaps this is to suggest that she would be prohibited from holding that position if she did not meet the criteria of being cute, thin, and trendy. In short, despite her skin color, she was enough like all the other "cute little hostess-types" and recommended through a personal contact for the job. (38)

In their totality, these study findings suggest a pattern of differential hiring practices and a form of steering employees toward different positions. At the same time, many respondents had been able to successfully navigate their employment within the restaurant without having to examine how privilege may have played a role in their own hiring or how their racial identity marked their positions within the restaurant. Nearly all respondents worked in the front of the house, and they consequently had had little opportunity to work side by side with people of color. That situation reinforced certain prejudicial attitudes, as explained next.

Setting the Backstage for a Culture of White Servers

The "behind the scenes" or backstage context of the culture of workers is shaped by the dichotomous racial composition of front- and back-of-the-house positions. The interview data reveal that a "culture of white servers" exists in the restaurants described in our sample. In this culture, white servers relate to each other in sharing the experience of dealing directly with customers and working for tips. Differential access to server positions excludes people of color from joining the ranks of this culture of white servers, as many respondents revealed. As one server pointed out, "There are a lot of racial divides in the restaurant."

Respondents shared that these divides provided a means by which white servers were able to actively exclude themselves from other workers backstage, using a private racial language that was deliberately hidden from people of color and from managers. The racial language reflected a relatively widespread anti-black belief system that took the form of the use of racial code words and a reliance on racial stereotypes to guide the level of service black Americans would receive. The interview data cited numerous examples of how white workers actively engaged in backstage racial and stereotypical language to denigrate black American diners and how this shaped their front-stage dining experiences.

Canadians, Cousins, Moolies, and "White People"

We found that many of the restaurant workers described in this study actively engaged in racially based coding of people, actions, and ideas. This backstage, codified racial language is consistent with Toni Morrison's term "race talk," meaning coding primarily used to degrade "others"--that is, people of color. (39) One respondent spoke directly about servers' use of racial language in backstage areas:

It's only behind closed doors. Like, you

know, like they would never go out into

like "the real world" and, you know, like

call somebody a "nigger," or anything

like that. Like they wouldn't do that. It's

not that type of overt, prejudiced racism.

But it is a closed-door joking, kidding

around.

That assessment of the backdrop by which white servers can openly share racist sentiments among other white servers begins to reveal the backstage existence of race talk in the restaurant. To avoid using the term nigger even in the restaurant's backstage, white servers in one respondent's restaurant used the word Canadians as a code word for black Americans, as follows:

When a table, you know, a black table

were to come into the restaurant, a lot of

people ... there's a code word at my restaurant

that's called "Canadian," and so,

being a hostess, I get asked a lot by the

servers, don't seat me with "Canadians.'"

And that's known throughout the restaurant

as "don't seat me with black people"

because they're not tipped well or

they don't tip well and you know, you're

just gonna, it's just gonna be an aggravation,

and that's what the general consensus

in the restaurant is, is that it's just

gonna be a big aggravation to have that

table sit in your section because it's

gonna be a waste of time for you.

Other respondents cited the identical use of that term or words like it in other restaurants. Code words included cousins, moolies, and even white people. (40) When asked, most respondents could not explain the possible origin of the code words. Deciphering what the code words meant was described as part of the informal employee "training." One respondent explained the nonliteral use of the term white people in the backstage areas of her restaurant:

You had to kind of, like try to ... read

between the lines so you could figure out

what people were saying. We had a couple

of servers, a lot--well, quite a few

servers, who would come back to the

back stage area and would say, "I hate

white people." I remember the first time

I heard that; I thought, "that is kind of

striking." And then I noticed that [those

servers] were serving a black family, for

example. So that became a racially

coded way in which they could express

their racist sentiment yet still do it in a

nonracist way. So it just became this

kind of racist schizophrenia.

The "racist schizophrenia" noted by that respondent shows use of racial code words in presenting oneself as nonracist. White servers can use code words openly and appear nonracist while still harboring negative racist sentiments. (41) As such, "speaking nasty about black people" can be done with ease as black customers and employees are not privy to the words' meanings. (42)

When other respondents in the sample were questioned about the existence of code words, one hostess recalled that there was not necessarily a use of code words but a more discreet form of coding. She shared,

Servers would come up and say ...

"don't seat me with 'these people'"

instead of just saying, "don't seat me

with 'black people.'"

Another respondent's answer highlighted that among some workers, there was little need for words in code. Servers would say directly, "don't seat me with black people," instead of using terms to conceal their prejudice. In nearly all of the interviews, racial coding was linked to the pervasive derogatory stereotyping of black American diners.

Stereotyping of Black American Customers

Stereotypes of black American customers ranged from the types of foods they would order ("chicken fingers" and "free waters") to the alleged breaking of "acceptable" customer roles. As one server explained, "They [black customers] tend to be very snappy, and 'do this, do this,' like "ma'am,' snap in your face, and then don't leave you any tip, so most people don't want to serve them willingly." In every one of the interviews, the shared sentiment and "common knowledge" among white restaurant workers was that black Americans do not tip well, and as such, servers should "not waste their time" on these customers. (43)

Although there is some research suggesting that there may be ethnic tipping differences and that black Americans tend to tip less than white Americans, our study elucidates possible tipping differences in the context of everyday racism." (44) Indeed, as we explain next, many respondents articulated how stereotypes regarding black American customers shaped the prejudices of white servers and justified the numerous accounts of discriminatory actions reported in the interviews.

Attitudes Shaping Action

As we indicated above, in all of our interviews, tables of black diners were described as the most unwelcome of restaurant clientele, with servers going as far as to tell hostesses at the beginning of work shifts, "Oh, if a black table comes in, don't give it to me. Give it to so and so.... I don't want it." If a server was not able to get his or her way with a hostess, servers would often come up with other methods for dealing with "unwanted" tables directed toward hostesses: "Do you hate me or something?"; "I don't understand. Did I do something wrong?"; and "I hope you're glad that I won't be making any money tonight!" From a hostess's perspective, servers were described as "really pissed off like it's our fault that we sat them, you know, with a table that is gonna tip them poorly." One respondent recalled being harassed by angry white servers: "Everyone yelled at me when I gave [a black table] to them." Another shared the following:

When servers get aggravated at this restaurant

they tend to ... want to want to

yell and take it out on me and things like

that. Not at me personally, but like the

hostess staff, they'll come up and be

like, "Gosh, why did you seat me at that

table?" ... you know, just that automatic

reaction, "Oh, you sat me with a black

table."

The use of "hushed tones" and "silent looks" was also shared as a tactic used to keep racist sentiment private while still conveying an unwillingness to serve black customers. Two respondents recalled how servers would express this refusal when black diners would enter:

You know, when they see them walking

with who seats them, if they're standing

at the servers' station behind me I'll

hear, hear them whisper somethin' like,

"Not my section. Not my section." And

they'll give me, you know, kind of like

"eyes" as I'm walking them back

through the restaurant. Kind of, you

know, give me a look. And it's kind of

like a "Don't seat them in my section"

type look that they give.

I know a couple of servers who will get

very mad if a hostess even seats them a

black table.... I know a couple of servers

who ... get very upset. I'm friends

with a couple of different hostesses who

have said things about a couple of different

[servers who become angry at them].

I think they kind of make eye contact

when [black customers] are there but

they'll talk to them afterwards.

Here we begin to see a breakdown of hidden and hushed racial language regarding tipping, as white servers assume that white hostesses should share the anti-black sentiment and also empathize with their negative attitudes by not seating black customers in their sections.

"Pass the Table"

Many respondents suggested that servers viewed a table of black American diners as a punishment delivered by hostesses or by other servers, who would try to rid themselves of the duty. One server shared that her white coworkers would "beg me to take [a black table] away from them if I was waitressing myself." Other respondents elaborated on the ritual. One called it "the servers' game of 'Pass the Table.'" Another respondent described how servers in her restaurant would try to "make deals" and "swap tables" when they did not want to serve black customers. One hostess explained how this "game" worked:

A black table would come in and sit

down. Generally what would happen is

that a waiter is assigned a section of

tables and whenever someone sits in

that section they're responsible for that

table. They would try to have somebody

else take it, you know, "I'll do this," "I'll

give you my next so and so table if you do

this."

Another server added, "I've heard remarks from other servers ... 'Uh, I don't want to take that table 'cause they're black--they won't tip' whatever, you know." While servers play Pass the Table, dissatisfactory service has already begun. The precedent is set for the rest of the dining experience. As such, empirical examinations of potential tipping differences must provide a sufficient degree of context regarding the customers' experience.

Service with a Smirk

When one server was asked what would happen when servers would have to take an unwanted table, she commented, "I think that if they have to take the table, I think that they just give them the minimal.... I don't think they go out of their way, I don't think they go out of their way to be friendly. I think they just do it, because they have to, basically." Another server reflected the following sentiment: "Sometimes the people [servers] who would take care of them [black American diners] wouldn't give the best service because they didn't think they were going to tip well." In that vein, another said that the potential for poor service is evident:

I could see how they would say that [i.e.,

that black Americans face racial discrimination];

I know that when servers

get a black table they are not particularly

happy. They're approaching that table

thinking that they already have a bad tip.

So, why give someone good service to

try to prove you wrong when it's so

much easier to have them prove you

right?

Many of the respondents in the study talked at length about a hostile racial climate toward black diners and described a backstage where white servers' stereotypical beliefs took shape in the form of neglect and poor service. One respondent commented,

I think they're [black American diners]

treated poorly.... It seems like the ones

[servers] that have that attitude going in,

get poor tips.... I do think that the people

with the racist sentiments going into

it do place those on their tables and on

the service that they give to them [black

American diners].

This respondent and several others appeared to recognize a self-fulfilling prophecy--that if restaurant personnel believe that black Americans tip less and are therefore less deserving of equal service, servers may then, in fact, provide inferior service (which would then, theoretically, lead to "substandard" tipping behavior. (45) One server spoke at length about that negative cycle:

The servers that are getting the bad tips

from black tables are the ones who go

into it thinking they're getting a bad tip

so they're not giving the right service ...

the best service they can. So it's like a

big cycle.... And it's really aggravating

to me because I think it just perpetuates

their opinion of black customers.... If

you give them bad service 'cause you

have that idea going into it, then they're

going to tip you poorly! I do think that

the people with racist sentiments going

into it place those on the table and in the

service that they give to them.

When they give poor service to black diners (and therefore merit a small tip), white servers are able to confirm their preconceived notions of black Americans' tipping habits. Those servers feel "burned" and contribute their experiences to the shared discourse among fellow (white) servers. Not only are these self-fulfilling