A former student at State University of New York - New Paltz may
proceed with her lawsuit claiming her political science professor
harassed her by, among other things, calling her "Monica"
because of her imagined resemblance to Monica Lewinsky.
The ruling in Inbal Hayut v. SUNY et al. (02-9014) reversed a lower
court's ruling dismissing Hayut's claim against Professor Alex
Young while upholding dismissal of claims against the school and its
other officials.
Young's alleged conduct in the fall of 1998 "was not
limited to using the 'Monica' nickname, but included other
comments as well," Judge Guido Calabresi wrote Dec. 18 for the
appellate panel.
"These added context to the nickname by associating Hayut with
some of the more sordid details of the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal."
For example, Calabresi wrote, Young allegedly asked her regularly,
"How was your weekend with Bill?" and twice said, "Be
quiet, Monica. I will give you a cigar later."
Court documents indicated that although Hayut said she felt
humiliated and had difficulty sleeping as a result, she never challenged
Young over his conduct or reported it to school officials until later.
When school officials heard about it, Young said the remarks were
intended as jokes. Told they were taken seriously, he elected to retire.
Hayut sued SUNY, Young and individuals defendants in 2000, alleging
unlawful harassment and discrimination.
U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd granted summary judgment to the
defendants, and Hayut appealed.
The Fifth Circuit panel said it found "sufficient, disputed
evidence in the record" to make dismissal of the claims against
Young inappropriate.
"Hayut presented sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue
of fact with respect to the severity or pervasiveness of Professor
Young's conduct," Judge Calabresi wrote, so she may proceed
with her claim under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act that a state
official deprived her of a federally protected right.
Further, he said, a jury could find Young's conduct
"created an educational environment (a) which rose to an objective
level of hostility on the basis of sex, and (b) which had an adverse
effect on the terms and conditions of her educational experience."
He said there was enough evidence for a jury "to find the
'Monica' comments were severe enough to transcend the bounds
of propriety and decency, let alone harmless humor, and become
actionable harassment based on Hayut's sex."
COPYRIGHT 2004 JR Publishing,
Inc. Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.