Contemporary career counseling research has awakened career
counselors to the reality that their theories of development,
assessment, and intervention have been constructed within the
capitalistic structure of the late-20th-century labor force in the
United States. The social transition model of career counseling outlined
by M. Pope (2000) has identified changes in developmental theory,
assessment techniques, and intervention strategies, reflecting changes
in U.S. culture in the new millennium. With the career counselor's
focus on enhancing multicultural awareness, cultural sensitivity, and
globalization, this project presents the societal forces within a
Communist environment that influenced the career development process,
illustrated by a case history.
**********
Career counseling has experienced a rich developmental journey
through the 90-year evolution from initial vocational guidance movement,
which described the shift from an agrarian society to an industrial
society, to the contemporary career development models, which attempt to
encompass the rapid changes in the United States' technological,
change-driven corporate world. Pope (2000) has conceptualized a social
transitions stage model describing the changes in the brief history of
career counseling in the United States. He identified six stages,
ranging from the initial job placement focus to the current focus on
technology and changing demographics, internationalization and
multicultural dimensions, and the school-to-job transition. In
developing a vision for the future of career counseling, Parmer and Rush
(2003) boldly suggested that career professionals "suffer from
enclosing [themselves] within a cocoon of pretend reality" (p. 28).
They explained that, as early as 1962, Wrenn described that this reality
is based on the assumption that "the present is enduring" and
"is based upon the past and the known, upon seeing that which is as
though it would always be" (p. 445). Parmer and Rush alerted career
counselors that, with the rapid trends of globalization, current
"work and career terminology may not be reflective of thinking from
the perspective of local and global arenas" (p. 28).
Parmer and Rush (2003) continued by explaining that work is a
universal phenomenon. All cultures have opportunities for individuals to
find productive labor that helps to provide self-definition and
identity. However, they reminded career counselors that it is imperative
for them to understand the cultural context or fabric in which this work
plan is developed. Parmer and Rush shared the experience of a Peace
Corps volunteer serving in Africa who quickly learned that the Western
model of career counseling would not be an applicable template for
individuals socialized in cultures with very different societal work
norms and standards.
Contemporary career development theories have focused on
person--environment fit, human development, and social learning as the
foundation for Western models of career formation and counseling
interventions. Chung (2003) awakened career counselors to the reality
that these theories incorporate the values and views of the modern
industrial era and are established on a hierarchical model
characteristic of large organizations in the United States in the past
century. Osipow and Fitzgerald (1996) noted that "the question of
career development in other cultures is ignored" (p. 328). After
reviewing the articles published in 2004 in the major American career
journals, Guidon and Richmond (2005) also concluded, "What we have
not learned enough about is career work ... with people whose cultural
experience is vastly different from that of first-world nations"
(p. 128).
With the challenges of Wrenn (1962) and the reinvigorating of this
challenge by Parmer and Rush, career counselors need to broaden the
competencies of cultural awareness in order to leave the cocoon of
"cultural encapsulation" (Parmer & Rush, 2003, p. 26).
This project attempts to enlarge career counselors' sphere by
presenting the cultural influences on career development within a
Communist country and illustrates these unique influences with a case
study of a young man raised in Communist Romania.
Communist Principles Influencing Education and Career Development
After World War II, Eastern European countries, including Hungary,
Poland, Bulgaria, and Romania, were forced to change their social,
political, and economic standards to a radical system designed and
imposed by the Soviet Union. Prior to the introduction of Communist
principles, these Eastern European societies had identified themselves
largely with Western Europe's cultural, religious, and intellectual
heritage (Brzezinski, 1989). The new political and governmental
transitions put specific imprints on these societies' cultures,
causing challenging transformations. Brzezinski commented that
cultural superiority, even if reluctantly and secretly acknowledged
by those dominated, was a critical factor in the ability of the
Roman or British or French empires to endure for so long. In
contrast, the Soviet empire is viewed in Eastern Europe--rightly or
wrongly--as retrogressive subjugation by a culturally inferior
nation. Thus, even forty years after Stalin's imposition of Soviet
rule, the Eastern European societies still chafe under their
Communist regimes. (p. 105)
Engels (1914/1923) envisioned a classless "communal
society" (p. 21) in which the strategy, the means, and the results
of production belong to society as a whole. The starting point in
creating this new social order he called Communism was the management of
material resources with the abolition of private property. In
Engel's view, the economic reorganization paralleled the management
of human resources, as the needs of each individual became closely
linked to the needs of the society. One of the first direct consequences
to the massive social restructuring that had as a goal the creation of a
classless, communal society was the emphasis on obedience and
conformity.
Studies on the historical and cultural context of career
development in East Germany and China emphasize strikingly similar
principles and processes with the ones observed in Romania and the
Soviet Union, given that obedience and conformity were vital to the
successful functioning of each of these Communist societies (Pinquart,
Juang, & Silbereisen, 2004; Zhang, Hu, & Pope, 2002). Article 10
of the former Romanian work code (Codul Muncii Republicii Socialiste
Romania, 1973), for example, stipulated that work relationships be based
on "the free acceptance of and constant conformity to the socialist
work discipline" (p. 13). The spirit and tone of this principle is
still reflected in the present Constitution of the Communist Party of
China, adopted on November 14, 2002:
Party members must adhere to the principle that the interests of the
Party and the people stand above everything else, subordinating
their personal interests to the interests of the Party and the
people, being the first to bear hardships and the last to enjoy
comforts, working selflessly for the public interests and working to
contribute more. (para. 31)
The developmental plan required personal sacrifices and censored
any expression of dissatisfaction or criticism. The influence of Western
psychological or philosophical insights was interpreted as a
destabilizing force that represented the potential for ideological
overturn, and thinking "outside the lines" (Brzezinski, 1989,
p. 52) risked being declared subversive. The educational curriculum was
carefully selected to represent the socialist ideology, and the import
of Western books (especially on psychology or philosophy) was severely
restricted. Brzezinski explained, "Philosophical debates were
inherently incompatible with a doctrine that saw itself as a closed
system containing scientifically correct answers to all social
dilemmas" (p. 152).
Political centralism was accompanied by cultural centralism. Each
of the Eastern European countries, along with China, used a centralized
plan of government aligned to the same Communist principles represented
by the Soviet Union (Pinquart et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2002). In
Romania, the construction of a centralized economic system had two
primary objectives: the industrialization of the economy and the
establishment of socialism (Bachman, 1989). The plan for
industrialization identified the working class as the ruling force,
requiring a rigid outline that nominated the number of workers needed in
each sector of the work environment. The educational focus was on
expanding the working class, and the slots open in the educational
system reflected this strategy.
In Romania (of the 1970s and 1980s), education was mandatory up to
the 10th grade and free for the entire length of study. However, the
number of high school graduates accepted into colleges or universities
was severely restricted. According to the U.S. Library of Congress Study
of Romania (Bachman, 1989), only 8% of these graduates were permitted to
enroll into the highest educational track. The very same statistics (8%)
apply to their East German peers, whereas in West Germany, 23% of late
adolescents were accepted into colleges (Pinquart et al., 2004).
According to Heller (1988), in the Soviet Union in the 1950s,
"roughly 80% of the children finishing secondary school entered an
institute of higher education; in the late 1970s, the figure was not
more than 18%" (p. 163). Commenting on what they called "the
governmental regimentation of access to the highest school track"
(p. 127), Pinquart et al. noted that, in East Germany, access to
university was determined by the expected need for employees in the
relevant fields.
Indeed, Romania shared in this educational strategy with other
Communist countries; the profiles and number of career specializations
were regulated by a governmental plan outlining need and availability of
job opportunities. Highlighting the contrast between democratic and
totalitarian regimes, Pinquart et al. (2004) wrote, "Whereas in
Western countries educational and career choices are only minimally
influenced by the policy, the government of the former East European
communist countries intruded upon individual career choices to a large
extent" (p. 126). The welfare of each person had to be subordinated
to the socioeconomic priorities of the government, resulting in severely
restricted choices for the individual.
Another Communist principle that had a strong impact on the career
choice was the "equal obligation on all members of society to
work" (Engels, 1914/1923, p. 19). It was readily adopted in the
Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Romania (Constitutia
Republicii Socialiste Romania, 1972), which provided that "work is
a duty of honor for each citizen of this country" (p. 4). The
Romanian work code (Codul Muncii Republicii Socialiste Romania, 1973)
also stated, in its very first paragraph, that "workers have the
right and the obligation to engage in work that is necessary to society,
as each person's welfare and interests are organically linked to
the welfare and development of the society as a whole" (p. 8). The
addition of the obligation to work forced far-reaching changes in the
work ethics and the career choice process. If unemployment was to be
eradicated, every high school or college graduate was to be guarantee a
job. The significant impact of this provision was that, upon completion
of one's educational program, an individual could not apply for a
job of his or her choice; the individual was assigned a job. Therefore,
during the educational course, students began the career decision-making
process by weighing concerns about various factors determined by job
assignment, particularly geographical location of the assignment. The
opportunity to work in a large city or to remain close to home, along
with the anticipated working conditions, became the most important
factors in the final decision. The already low number of options
available for college or university studies was further reduced by the
undesirability of some of their assignments. The range of career choices
was restricted and had a very limited field of action in the socialist
Romania (Ioanid, 2000; Ludusan, 2003).
Sen (2000) examined the interplay of factors that create the unique
context in which development takes place, evidencing the crucial role of
freedom on self-determination and quality of life. Sen's view of
freedom encompasses both "the processes that allow freedom of
actions and decisions, and the actual opportunities that people have,
given their personal and social circumstances" (p. 17). Five
distinct yet interconnected types of instrumental freedoms are
identified: (a) political freedoms, (b) economic facilities, (c) social
opportunities, (d) transparency guarantees, and (e) protection security.
The aforementioned governmental strategies that make the subject of our
study are undeniable social influences on the nature and reach of these
individual freedoms; they shape the capability set of alternatives, or
what a person is free to do, independent of his or her abilities (Sen,
2000).
Sen's (2000) systematical organization, definition, and
overview of instrumental freedoms helps us in underlining their
disruption by the Romanian Communist state actions. First, political
freedom, the liberty to choose from different political parties, was
nonexistent, given that there was only one political organization: the
Romanian Communist Party. Second, communal property and centralization
of the economic system translated into a lack of economic facilities,
denying the individual entitlement to economic transactions. Third, free
access to health care and education represented unprecedented
conveniences welcomed by all citizens. However, the central planning and
economic reality of the Communist administration put its imprint on this
social opportunity by limiting the access to higher education and the
level of health care offered (e.g., by severely restricting the import
of new medical technology). The politically shaped and restricted range
of social opportunities was also evident in the process of career choice
and advancement, because hierarchical advancement was open only to
members of the Communist Party. Fourth, the growing reality of
censorship in the informational system, paralleled by the spread of
suspicion and distrust among young and old Romanians alike, gives the
picture of an increasing opaqueness (the very opposite of transparency)
throughout the 42 years of Communist rule. Finally, through guaranteed
employment and pensions, the Communist system offered the undisputed
advantage of protection security. Ironically, the aforementioned
protection security, the only instrumental freedom familiar to Romanian
citizens, was fractured by the overturn of the Communist regime. It is
easily understandable why in 1992, 3 years after the Revolution of 1989,
the newly elected president won the campaign under the slogan "A
president for our peace of mind!" (I. Ulescu, personal
communication, May 3, 2005). Discussing the reluctance to change a
previously confining situation, Sen (2000) wrote,
Deprived people tend to come to terms with their deprivation because
of the sheer necessity of survival, and they may, as a result, lack
the courage to demand any radical change, and may even adjust their
desires and expectations to what they unambitiously see as feasible.
(p. 63)
Higher Education Possibilities and College Choice Process
According to the U.S. Library of Congress Study of Romania
(Bachman, 1989), the Romanian academic system was highly competitive,
with very restricted numbers for admissions to university. Choosing a
college was equivalent to choosing a career with that decision completed
by the end of high school at the age of 18. "Despite an impressive
network of universities, technical colleges, academies and
conservatories, only 8 percent of those eligible for higher education
were permitted to enroll. The central government allocated slots based
on predicted demand for given occupations" (para. 16). With this
restricted opportunity for admissions, competition became very intense
at an early age. Because entrance exam scores were the sole criterion
used for acceptance into higher education programs, students began
planning their area of specialization as early as the eighth grade, so
they would be able to devote a significant portion of their high school
education to this academic focus. This practice required career choice
and decisions to be pushed to the age of 16, or sometimes even as early
as 14 (Bachman, 1989).
Upon high school graduation, a student was permitted to apply to
only one college, in one specific department. Past academic records or
related experience held no value during the admission process; the only
admission criterion was the score on the entrance examinations (Bachman,
1989). With this early age for career decisions, it is not surprising
that family had a strong influence on career orientation. As Lent,
Brown, and Hackett (2000) observed, an individual's family or
immediate circle of significant others functions both "as a filter
that distills perceptions of structural barriers in the larger
environment and [as] a source of information about how one might cope
with such barriers" (p. 45). Families acquired private tutoring for
their children many years prior to the highly selective and demanding
entrance exams. These families were attempting to ensure success in the
chosen career arena. "The cost of a private tutor was prohibitive
for many workers and peasant families, and rural-urban differences in
education exacerbated their differences" (Bachman, 1989, para. 18).
For students who gained successful admission to the competitive and
selective university programs, the Romanian state provided generous
financial support, including low-cost housing and meals, free tuition,
book subsidies, and monthly stipends. The financial package awarded
depended on various factors, like socioeconomic background and area of
specialization.
The national economic policy, through its centralized planning
system, also led to a departure from the common gender stereotypes of
career choice. Higher numbers of college admission slots and greater
opportunities for large city assignments made engineering an especially
attractive field of studies. Because separate college admissions were
offered to male and female applicants, many female students took
advantage of the educational slots available in electronics,
construction, heavy machinery, or metallurgic engineering, for example
(I. Ulescu, personal communication, May 3, 2005).
At the universities, the curricular content placed a strong
emphasis on theoretical knowledge and minimized the value of practical
applications and experiential work opportunities within the educational
experience. According to Ludusan (2003), "the entry exam
competition accentuated students' study efficacy and performance,
it increased their level of knowledge. However, the educational system
failed to offer the experiential tools needed for the practical
integration of that knowledge" (p. 10). The highly specialized
college curriculum carried the informational load of a combined
bachelor's- and master's-level education. With the lack of
practical experience, however, graduates faced a great disadvantage when
they attempted to "translate" these studies to Western
educational standards. With the downfall of the Communist regime and
abrupt opening of opportunities to work and study abroad, necessity to
establish an international curriculum of university studies emerged with
unprecedented power (Ludusan, 2003).
The following case study provides an example of a career
development path shaped by the Communist influences of contemporary
Romania. A structured interview was conducted to investigate the career
choice process, the meaning of career and the definition of success, and
real or perceived risks and obstacles throughout the career path.
Case History
Flaviu, a 42-year-old Romanian man, described the familial context
in which he grew up as rather atypical of a Romanian family of the 1970s
and 1980s. "Families are small in Romania, most of them of no more
than two children, and both parents have to work in order to make the
ends meet," he explained. This was not the case in Flaviu's
family. His father worked as a military engineer, and his mother stayed
home and raised the children. The oldest of three children, Flaviu
remembered vividly his parents' material difficulties due to the
limited income, but he emphasized that their message has always been
about achieving the highest education rather than making money.
In my extended family, work has never been considered just means to
put bread on the table. It was important what you were doing. The
lesson was that you choose to do in life whatever you liked to do.
Money was going to come along the way.
Flaviu's subsequent evolution stayed true to this model,
although he never forgot his parents' financial struggle and put
effort into ensuring that his career choices would lead to financial
comfort as well.
Flaviu's initial career dreams and later career development
were set in motion by an early childhood memory: watching the moon
landing.
I was 6 years old when it happened. Space flight was the most
fascinating thing of my early years and keeps being as such even
today. This was a thread along which my choices of reading, doing,
and dreaming were built on.
Indeed, reading and dreaming flourished together. As soon as he
learned to read, Flaviu spent most of his free time surrounded by
adventure and science fiction books. It was a way to travel and to learn
about interesting things, places, or times where he could not be; it was
a way to access parallel realities that were out of reach.
In his desire to become an astronaut, the young boy first turned
his attention toward physics. Later on, during his high school years,
Flaviu studied astronomy and became increasingly more interested in
philosophy. "It completed the perspective on how the world
works," he explained.
I was really fascinated with philosophy and still am. I hoped that I
would have my contribution to the history of thinking and mankind
through writing. This was my first option in high school. On the
other had, I was interested in science and technology.
Strongly inclined to choose philosophy as a career, Flaviu
researched the opportunities and became "painfully aware" that
being a philosopher in Romania translated into being a teacher of
Marxism. "I wouldn't have really made a living, and I would
have hated myself for doing it," he explained.
Flaviu's parents strongly discouraged his choice of philosophy
as well. Although their message about a future career had always been
supportive of Flaviu's talents ("Choose whatever you like to
do!"), soon he understood that the suggestion was defined by the
realities of the Romanian job market, characterized by a very restricted
range of careers. At the end of high school, Flaviu was resigned to
follow in his father's footsteps. He applied to the military
academy and studies in aerospace electronics. The choice was also
spurred by the family's financial difficulties, because the
military was the only institution offering free housing, free food, and
free books for the first 3 years of studies. Flaviu passed the entrance
exam into college with the highest grade and was valedictorian at
graduation. His academic success is even more remarkable considering
that his achievements are entirely attributable to his intelligence and
hard work; Flaviu's parents never were able to pay for any private
tutoring, a standard for many students in the very competitive
educational programs.
After college graduation, Flaviu was assigned to a helicopter base
outside the city, in a maintenance job that came in deep contrast with
his skills and aspirations. For 2 years, he commuted more than 5 hours a
day, 6 days a week. After the 1989 revolution, Flaviu transferred to an
institute closer to home and worked in research and development.
"It was exactly what I expected engineering to be, making the
dreams come true," he said. Identified by his ability to assimilate
complex information and transform it into innovative solutions, Flaviu
was selected to be part of a special research project team to work in
Israel. The 5 years spent there were described as the climax of his
career in aerospace engineering, but the return to Romania led to a
series of disappointments. The research and development department he
had worked for now seemed stagnant, and the lack of real projects became
frustrating. "I did not want to stay there and just wait for
retirement," Flaviu commented.
I gave it up, because I wanted to do something with my life. I
looked around for 1 year. Initially, I tried to look in aerospace,
but it was useless, because there was nothing. I tried to find a
place where I can leave a trace, and I can have the satisfaction of
accomplishing something.
Four years ago, Flaviu decided to embark on a new career in
business development. He described it as a "completely upside-down
thing" from what he did in the military.
You have to make your own money; nobody pays you from the budget.
And you can lose your job tomorrow if you are not making money for
the company. There is no safety net there. It was very challenging.
On the other hand, it was appealing, because I could make a
difference by bringing programs to life.
Flaviu enjoys challenging situations that call on his ability to
quickly assess resources and take appropriate actions.
The decision to change careers came with personal sacrifice. Flaviu
had to give up not only a military career of 18 years but also an early
retirement. He will have to retire at 65 years of age instead of 55.
Understandably, he got apprehensive about "dropping everything
behind and going into uncharted waters." Yet, as he described, the
most difficult part of the change does not pertain to what was left
behind or to what is to come; it has to do with the everyday demands
that the new career places on his time, leaving him exhausted.
Asked about his present satisfaction level, Flaviu answered that he
is not sure if the present career is more satisfying than his past
career in avionics software. He added, though, that it is certainly more
rewarding than the time right before he left the military.
I'm talking about making a difference around me, not necessarily in
my life. I'm talking about leaving a mark. It is also a difference
in my life, obviously. I work long hours, and I am better paid. But
the biggest difference is about making things happen around me. I am
no longer frustrated.
Discussion
Contemporary career counseling theories are based on a number of
implicit assumptions: There is free choice and a large range of
occupational choices; occupational success is largely attributable to
individual merit; individual assessment, exploration of personality
traits, and career dreams bring one closer to making them happen; and
work plays a central role in people's lives. Personality
characteristics and individual preferences play less of a role in career
orientation than does conformity to the expectations initially outlined
by parents and reinforced by the societal Communist principles. Emphasis
is placed very early in the adolescent years on education choices linked
to specific career needs of the government. Counselors trained in the
Western models of career development theories need to be aware of the
limitations in the application of contemporary career orientation models
for individuals whose career paths were shaped within a Communist
culture. Counselors need to be sensitive to the fact that, with these
clients, career history may simply be a fortuitous path, not a product
of careful planning or a reflection of personality. Therefore, it is
essential to reality test inferences and assumptions when taking a
career history, especially when the historical or cultural context in
which the career choice took place had a restricted range of options.
Contemporary theories, developed in the Western cultures, are
strongly linked to Western values. These theories hold an emic (insider)
perspective, although it is often assumed these theories are etic
(generalizable). As career counselors focus on self-efficacy, outcome
expectations, and personal goals, these constructs provide an awareness
of variables that are less culture dependent.
Future counseling strategies with clients who did not live in the
Western world during their early developmental years will benefit from
longitudinal research that follows the career journey of individuals who
make their career transition into the world of work in this new culture.
Longitudinal research will provide interesting data about the tools that
facilitate a successful transition for these cross-cultural clients.
References
Bachman, R. D. (Ed.). (1989). Romania: A country study. Washington,
DC: Library of Congress, Federal Research Division. Retrieved November
4, 2003, from http://countrystudies.us/romania/
Brzezinski, Z. (1989). The grand failure: The birth and death of
Communism in the twentieth century. New York: Scribner.
Chung, Y. B. (2003). Ethical and professional issues in career
assessment with lesbian, gay and bisexual persons. Journal of Career
Assessment, 11, 96-112.
Codul muncii Republicii Socialiste Romania [The work code of the
Socialist Republic of Romania]. (1973). Bucharest, Romania: I.T.C.
Constitutia Republicii Socialiste Romania [The Constitution of the
Socialist Republic of Romania]. (1972). Bucharest, Romania: Editura
Politica.
Constitution of the Communist Party of China. (2002). Retrieved
September 1, 2005, from
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/china/docs/const.html
Engels, F. (1923). Principiile comunismului [The principles of
Communism]. Barlad, Romania: N. Peiu. (Original work published 1914)
Guidon, M. H., & Richmond, L. J. (2005). Practice and research
in career counseling and development--2004. The Career Development
Quarterly, 54, 90-137.
Heller, M. (1988). Cogs in the wheel: The formation of Soviet man.
New York: Knopf.
Ioanid, I. (2000, July 25). Despre generatii [About generations].
Adevarul Literar, p. 12.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual
supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36-49.
Ludusan, A. (2003, March 18). Statul subteran si egalitatea de
sanse [The underground state and the equality of opportunities].
Observator Cultural, p. 10.
Osipow, S., & Fitzgerald, L. (1996). Theories of career
development (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Parmer, T., & Rush, L. C. (2003). The next decade in career
counseling: Cocoon maintenance or metamorphosis? The Career Development
Quarterly, 52, 26-34.
Pinquart, M., Juang, L. P., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2004). The
role of self-efficacy, academic abilities, and parental education in the
change in career decision of adolescents facing German unification.
Journal of Career Development, 31, 125-142.
Pope, M. (2000). A brief history of career counseling in the United
States. The Career Development Quarterly, 48, 194-211.
Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Wrenn, C. G. (1962). The culturally encapsulated counselor. Harvard
Educational Review, 32, 444-449.
Zhang, W., Hu, X., & Pope, M. (2002). The evolution of career
guidance and counseling in the People's Republic of China. The
Career Development Quarterly, 50, 226-236.
Lona Whitmarsh and Ruxandra Ritter, Department of Psychology,
Fairleigh Dickinson University. Correspondence concerning this article
should be addressed to Lona Whitmarsh, Department of Psychology,
M-AB2-01, Fairleigh Dickinson University, 285 Madison Avenue, Madison,
NJ 07940 (e-mail: whit@fdu.edu).
COPYRIGHT 2007 National Career Development
Association Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.