[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
"If a business intelligence solution can't help you make
sound decisions about your company's future quickly, easily and
with confidence, it's neither good business nor intelligent."
Jim Goodnight, Ph.D, CEO, SAS
Healthcare in the U.S. is on the cusp of monumental change.
Already, the hospital and provider community is dealing with varying
stages of consumer-directed healthcare and public access to quality and
cost metrics; heightened focus on compliance with evidence-based care
protocols; and, a staggering number of tier-network and reimbursement
programs. Each of these fundamentally affects revenue streams, expense
management and the ability to compete. Considered alongside the external
economic forces impacting all industries, it is clear that healthcare
industry executives must evaluate an increasing amount of information to
best assess their organization's health and future.
In the middle of this healthcare ecosystem is an avalanche of
information that is expanding on an hourly basis. Whereas 10 years ago,
skeptics argued that the abundance of paper-based business processes in
healthcare precludes the adoption of electronic information systems, our
industry has now seen a strong uptake of data collection and management
systems covering administrative processes, clinical care and all
functions in between.
Given this progress, one might assume healthcare CFOs and finance
departments are now in a much better position to make informed
decisions: Insights into reimbursements, utilization and staffing,
capital management, emergency care spending and many other areas should
be within our grasp. Yet CFOs know the reality--valuable data assets sit
in electronic silos spread across their organizations.
Healthcare executives and care providers cannot afford to spin
their heads from one data silo to another, grasping for slivers of
insight. If we are to improve productivity, cost management and care
outcomes, we must adopt better mechanisms for making informed decisions
and corresponding business improvements. That type of cultural shift
towards precision and certainty can only be attained through
evidence-based knowledge derived from an integrated view of the
enterprise.
The Changing Role of Finance in Healthcare
The role of the finance department continues to evolve and become
more strategic as the healthcare industry transforms. The CFO must
ensure transparency; streamline consolidation and reporting; improve the
accuracy of plans and budgets; align day-to-day operations with
long-term goals; predict and respond to market changes; reduce costs and
streamline processes; understand profit drivers and grow profitability;
and, ease the strain of compliance requirements. In short, healthcare
CFOs must understand the entire business of healthcare.
A CFO's ability to effectively manage and harness financial,
operational or clinical data is crucial to an organization's
success. However, discovering the value hidden in an organization's
diverse and distributed data is an ongoing challenge. Many finance
departments still use manual, complicated and inaccurate reporting tools
to view data; and, financial processes are not always aligned throughout
the enterprise. Meanwhile, the healthcare industry continues to capture
more and more data, typically centered on organizational staffing
disciplines.
Data silos have proliferated for care support, patient data and
diagnostics, clinical care, finance and accounting. In many
organizations, a litany can be found resonating in the halls: "The
information needed does not exist," or "We still use paper
records," or "The data is not clean enough," and, the
ever present "We do things differently." Some of these
rationales represent legitimate challenges to leveraging technology to
make better decisions; however, none of them represents insurmountable
obstacles that have not been solved in other healthcare institutions.
Brigham & Women's Hospital (BWH) in Boston, Mass.,
implemented a performance management system built upon a platform of
business intelligence (BI) and analytics. This system integrates,
analyzes and distributes data from all patient contact and care
delivery--from 29 sources and 50,000 patient encounters a year--into
best practices and operations throughout the hospital, whether in a
patient care setting or the business office. Intelligence is shared with
executive management, physicians and frontline employees. Staff at all
levels can see how their actions--individually and as a whole--affect
the bottom line and patient satisfaction.
"There are huge workforce issues, particularly in nursing, and
in technical and specialty areas," says Michael Gustafson, M.D.,
BWH's vice president of clinical excellence. "The public
expects increased accountability to make sure that hospitals are
providing quality care and safe environments. There is an increased
demand among patients for better service from physicians, too. And,
patients are getting more involved; they have higher expectations when
they come in for care."
To successfully address these issues, organizations must integrate
performance measures from both provider and business organizations, and
forge a single strategy for delivering the right set of services to the
public. However, without incorporating all relevant data,
across-the-board improvements would be difficult at best. BWH's
analytical BI system has contributed to improved reimbursement
arrangements from payers as well as lowering care delivery expenses.
"To make informed decisions you need the data capabilities,
and to drive change, you need accountability and incentives," says
Gustafson. "When you put all of the management pieces in place, you
have the ability to identify and implement real improvements."
A CEO's Perspective
Jim Goodnight, Ph.D, founder and CEO of SAS, is no stranger to the
data silo scenario. For more than 30 years, his company has helped
organizations such as CIGNA HealthCare, Healthways and Highmark to link
and leverage disparate corporate data assets and create clearer views of
performance.
"Business intelligence powered by analytics enables all layers
of an organization to exploit every data source to understand the past,
examine the present and predict the future, and confidently act on this
knowledge. Business intelligence is derived through a technology
platform that allows for full access to any current data store, or
future data sources, without creating or investing in additional data
silos."
Dr. Goodnight sees healthcare organizations progressing through a
business intelligence maturation process over time, starting with simple
reporting and eventually growing to leverage the most sophisticated
types of analytical methods. Whereas most healthcare organizations today
focus on basic reporting, Goodnight believes a more comprehensive
approach to BI and analytics ensures that organizations can continue to
improve over time.
"A technology platform is truly BI-oriented if it supplies a
full scope of analytic tools, ranging from simple summaries to advanced
predictive modeling, from which better and more relevant insight into
the business can be achieved."
Of course, getting the information together and conducting the
analysis is only a small part of the process. Ensuring that the right
people are able to view and act on the information in a way that is
natural to them is equally challenging. This is especially true in
healthcare, where potential information consumers include both medical
and administration functions with a wide variety of skill sets. Assuming
that basic reporting will produce the desired end results is where many
organizations miss the mark.
"If a business intelligence solution can't help you make
sound decisions about your company's future--quickly, easily and
with confidence--it's neither good business nor intelligent,"
says Goodnight.
BI in Practice
Though industries such as financial services and retail adopted
business intelligence more quickly than healthcare, many hospitals and
providers now have an initiative focused on BI. Some are in the
early-stages of development and some are further along the learning
curve.
Maine Medical Center in Portland, Maine, has a leading-edge focus
on patient care and quality that is, in part, driven by focusing key
performance metrics on ensuring that evidence-based care gets delivered.
Measuring everything from staff hand-washing compliance to whether
patients are taking the right dosage of medicine, Maine Medical compares
care performance metrics against financial objectives. This facilitates
a better understanding of the impact changes have on both patient and
financial health.
An example of the payoff from BI and analytics can be seen in the
hospital's treatment of congestive heart failure: The Joint
Commission sets a list of standard treatments that every hospital needs
to offer every congestive heart failure patient. It's an extensive
list that includes measuring the function of the heart's left
ventricular valve to counseling patients on diet and lifestyle. When
Maine Medical first started its measurements, only 60 percent of
patients were receiving all the treatment and counseling that
evidence-based medicine sets as a standard of care, however, that has
improved.
"In our most recent month we were at 95 percent
performance," says Doug Salvador, associate chief medical officer.
"We've been averaging over 85 percent for four consecutive
months on the heart failure core measures." Meeting a high percent
of guidelines is critical to receiving the highest reimbursements from
Medicare, Medicaid and those private insurers with various stages of
pay-for-performance programs.
Whether initiated by the Chief Medical Officer or the CFO, the
culture of collaboration that BI can nurture is present at BWH, Maine
Medical and other leading organizations. Still, there is significant
opportunity for growth in BI adoption within healthcare and the CFO can
lead this evolution by continuously including all disciplines within the
organization in the performance evaluation process. Financial
performance reporting and forecasts will always be more complete with a
better understanding of the impact every care delivery change has on
margins.
"It has never been more important that we find ways of
improving healthcare in the U.S.," says Goodnight. "BI
delivers opportunities to better grasp the markers of profitable
operations and patient care dynamics. This impacts every healthcare
CFO."
The application of advanced analytics enables the asking and
answering of the harder questions that will ultimately impact the
financial performance of every healthcare organization. By aggregating
and analyzing patient, provider and benefit plan data alongside
financial metrics, better decisions related to health outcomes and
evidence-based medicine protocols can be made--insights valuable to both
providers and payers.
BI can help remove the risk around decisions focused on disease
management, clinical effectiveness, safety and new consumer-directed
healthcare programs. Indeed, practically every major issue facing
healthcare today demands greater access and analysis of broader and
deeper sources of data than our traditional silos have provided.
BI From Concept to Practice
Intelligence we can act upon is difficult to derive and depends
upon a multitude of inputs, opinions and results from careful analysis
and study. Successful business intelligence programs cover four critical
areas that enable these types of decisions and actions: data integration
and quality; the application of sophisticated analytics; information
delivery to the right information consumers; and, institutionalizing an
ongoing discipline of information-driven business processes and best
practices.
Data Integration: All healthcare organizations do data integration
in some form, but the historical ad hoc approaches do not provide the
scale and rigor required by most analytically-driven applications. At a
minimum, the data integration platform must be able to facilitate data
management covering the myriad of data sources necessary to address
improvements demanded by administrative, financial and medical
stakeholders. As these data sources tend to be located across different
disciplines within the enterprise, an enterprise-oriented approach to
the data integration process is needed. For example, organizations need
a comprehensive electronic catalog of the various enterprise information
sources including automated access abilities, security rights and the
data definitions. This catalog enables analytical applications to be
developed without resorting to extensive and repeated manual effort.
Similarly, since the insights generated from the analytics can only be
as precise and valid as the information feeding the application, an
enterprise data quality plan is also common.
Analytics: While data integration is clearly a significant
component of any intelligence platform, and the complexity of data
sources should not be underestimated, you must incorporate advanced
analytics to add value for each subscriber. If value is perceived, each
stakeholder will focus on the degree to which the platform provides
insight and relevance, and each will want a variety of analyses to be
used against the platform.
So what is the range of analytical capabilities open to a CFO
today? At the most basic level there is standard reporting, generally
addressing "what happened." This is traditionally where
finance systems excel. Ad hoc reports allow an organization to address
questions of how many, how often, and where. Then there is drill-down
and more advanced query and reporting to explore where problems or
variances exist.
More sophisticated systems provide alerts to guide what actions are
needed. Then, the application of powerful advanced analytics such as
data mining, forecasting and optimization allows teams to understand why
things are happening around care, performance and costs. Forecasting
predicts what will happen if trends continue. Predictive modeling helps
the executive understand what will happen next depending on the actions
taken in response to a condition or trend; and, optimization offers the
very best balance between constraints such as quality and cost,
requiring the full range of analysis outlined.
Information Delivery: With data gathered from the contributing
stakeholders and advanced analytic capabilities in place, intelligent
solutions focus on the speed and accuracy of information and the manner
in which it is deployed. As stakeholders have personnel with various
degrees of overall management, detail-specificity and responsibility of
enacting change, a complete BI platform must offer a variety of methods
for deploying information. It is critical to consider each
stakeholder's "persona" by ensuring that the proper
format is available to them for visualization, exploration and
reporting. The better this alignment is achieved, the greater the
likelihood that stakeholders can achieve improved effectiveness and
efficiency.
A New Discipline: Business intelligence programs cannot be
successful if seen as one-time projects. The creation and deployment of
a reporting dashboard does nothing to ensure that sustainable
improvements in utilization, capital management, productivity or other
benefits are realized. Rather, it is through an ongoing program of
applying learning, identifying the next set of business questions that
need to be analyzed, and ensuring the needed behavioral changes of
healthcare workers that produce real benefits and, potentially,
competitive differentiation. Business intelligence is an enterprise
competency that grows over time.
The many challenges facing the healthcare arena have been
well-documented, and great opportunities exist for leveraging financial
information systems to contribute to more robust BI. Capitalizing on the
benefits of BI requires a commitment to organizational and cultural
change, continuous improvement, effective information management, and
new levels of experience in hiring. With the growth in demand for
healthcare informatics and the push for better intelligence, many
organizations are reshuffling the deck of personnel to establish a
cross-discipline team known as a Business Intelligence Competency Center
(BICC). A dedicated team within a BICC can strengthen a healthcare
enterprise's effectiveness in dealing with these challenges and
facilitate the farm of collaboration that results in substantive
improvement. Research funded by SAS found that 36 percent of those
surveyed have already established a BICC or other type of
cross-functional team dedicated to optimizing their BI initiative, and
organizations with mature information management practices actually
exceeded their previous year's performance.
Jason Burke (left) is worldwide director of life science and Rick
Ingraham is a global healthcare strategist for SAS. Contact them at
jason.burke@sas.com and rick.ingraham@sas.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Nelson
Publishing Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.