AMA apologizes for racial discrimination and pledges change.

African American physicians are looking for action to back up the words of apology recently tendered by the American Medical Association for more than a century of racial inequity and bias.

In accepting the AMA's apology, the National Medical Association (NMA), which represents minority physicians, urged the AMA leadership to work with them on three initiatives: recruiting more African American physicians, reducing health disparities among minorities, and requiring medical schools and licensing boards to make cultural competency mandatory for medical students, residents, and practicing physicians.

"We really want to use this apology as a springboard," said Dr. Nedra H. Joyner, chair of the NMA board of trustees and an otolaryngologist in Chicago. These changes will be critical to reversing racial health disparities that have led to poorer health outcomes in African Americans, she said.

"Talk is cheap," said Dr. Carl Bell, professor of public health and psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

Dr. Bell said he is hopeful that the AMA will take meaningful action to reduce health disparities, but is unimpressed by the apology alone. He would like the AMA take a stand on issues that would advance minority health in the United States. For example, he said, the AMA should push for single-payer national health insurance, be stronger in challenging the pharmaceutical industry, do a better job of promoting public health, and support research into minority health and mental health issues.

Dr. Warren A. Jones, who was the first African American president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, agreed that further action will be needed but called the AMA's apology "appropriate" and "timely." This is not an apology of convenience, he said, but a signal of a change in the mind-set of the AMA leadership.

The AMA can help ensure that cultural competency becomes a tool in the medical armamentarium in the same way as the stethoscope or the scalpel, he said. "Now is the time for the AMA to put its resources where its mouth is," said Dr. Jones, executive director of the Mississippi Institute for Improvement of Geographic Minority Health.

The AMA offered the apology in July to coincide with the release of a historic paper in its flagship journal that examined race relations in organized medicine (JAMA 2008;300:306-13). The paper was prepared by an independent panel of experts convened by the AMA in 2005. The panel reviewed archives of the AMA, the NMA, and newspapers from the time to provide a history from the founding of the AMA through the civil rights movement.

The paper notes instances where AMA leadership fostered racial segregation and bias. For example, in 1874 the AMA began restricting delegations to the organization's national convention to state and local medical societies. This effectively excluded most African American physicians because many medical societies, especially in the South, openly refused membership to them. In the 1960s, the AMA rejected the idea of excluding medical societies with discriminatory practices.

During the civil rights era, the AMA was seen as obstructing the civil rights agenda, the paper noted. In 1961, the AMA refused to defend eight African American physicians who were arrested after asking to be served at a medical society luncheon in Atlanta.

The independent panel applauded the AMA for its willingness to explore its history, but noted that the legacy of inequality still affects African American physicians and patients. For example, in 2006 African Americans made up 2.2% of physicians and medical students, less than in 1910 when 2.5% were African American.

In a commentary, Dr. Ronald M. Davis, immediate past president of the AMA, acknowledged the "stain left by a legacy of discrimination" and outlined what the AMA is doing to eliminate prejudice within the organization and improve minority health (JAMA 2008;300:323-5).

Dr. Davis said that the AMA leadership felt it was important to offer the apology to show the "current moral orientation of the organization" and lay down a marker to compare current and future actions.

The AMA has in place policies that explicitly prohibit discrimination in membership and support funding for "pipeline" programs to engage minority individuals to enter medical school. In addition, in 2004, the AMA, the NMA, and the National Hispanic Medical Association jointly formed the Commission to End Health Care Disparities. That group has been working to expand the "Doctors Back to School" program, which brings minority physicians into schools to encourage students to consider careers in medicine.

The ultimate goal is to have as much diversity among physicians as in the general population, where African Americans make up about 12% of the U.S. population, Dr. Davis said. "Obviously, we have a long way to go," he said.

TALK BACK

What's your reaction to the American Medical Association's apology for its history of racial discrimination?

Share your thoughts!

Send e-mail to imnews@elsevier.com;

click on the Talk Back box at

www.internalmedicinenews.com; or write to Internal Medicine News,

5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 6000,

Rockville, MD 20852.

BY MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER

New York Bureau