Relief from double taxation: The treatment of foreign
tax paid for individuals at the state level.
by Sherman, W. Richard^Brinker, Thomas M.
Double taxation occurs when there is an overlap of fiscal
sovereignty or powers at the domestic or international level. A common
example is the imposition of an income tax at both the federal and state
level. This particular instance of double taxation of the same income is
mitigated by the availability of an itemized deduction on the federal
tax return (Form 1040; Schedule A) for state and local income taxes
paid.
Another example of double taxation is when the same items of income
for the same taxable person for the same taxable period are taxed by two
countries--typically the taxpayer's country of residence and the
country in which the income is sourced (i.e., "earned").
Bilateral tax treaties often provide solutions to the problem of
international double taxation. However, when no treaty provision is
applicable, U.S. taxpayers can still gain some relief from double
taxation at the federal level by using some combination of the deduction
available under IRC Section 164(a)(3), the IRC Section 911 foreign
earned income exemption (up to $80,000 for years after 2001), and/or the
foreign tax credit (FTC; IRC Sections 901 and 906).
Double taxation exists at the state level as well. Frequently, a
taxpayer will be subject to tax on certain items of income in both
his/her state of residence as well as in the state in which the income
was earned. As is the case on the federal level, bilateral treaties
often provide the necessary relief. For example, under a reciprocal
agreement between Pennsylvania and New Jersey, a Pennsylvania resident
employed in New Jersey will not be subject to New Jersey income tax.
Instead, the taxpayer's New Jersey employer will withhold the
appropriate Pennsylvania income tax and emit the tax to the Pennsylvania
Department of Revenue. When no treaty exists between the resident and
source states, the most common way to deal with he situation is for the
resident state to provide a credit for the taxes paid to another state.
This credit is most commonly limited to taxes that were paid to me of
the other United States or to U.S. Possessions, not to taxes paid to
foreign countries. (1)
The gap between the federal and state treatment of foreign tax paid
is narrowed but not closed by the individual states' use of
deductions, credits, and exemptions. [Of course, in the seven states in
which there is no state income tax, the issue is moot.] These are
summarized in the accompanying exhibit.
Deductions for Foreign Taxes Paid
The relief most frequently available is an itemized deduction for
foreign taxes paid on the taxpayer's State Income Tax Return.
Twenty-nine states (and the District of Columbia) provide this option,
with eleven states giving the taxpayer the choice of taking a deduction
or a credit for these foreign taxes. It should be noted that most of
these states use the taxpayer's federal itemized deductions as a
starting point in determining the itemized deductions they allow on the
taxpayer's state return. One of the common adjustments made to
itemized deductions reported on the federal Schedule A in arriving at
the deductions available on the State Income Tax Return is to subtract
the State and Local Income Taxes Paid. This is to prevent the double
counting of these taxes as both a deduction in arriving at the State
Taxable Income and a credit against the State Income Tax.
However, since foreign taxes do not usually fall under the
definition of "State and Local Taxes," no adjustment is
necessary for these taxes. That being said, two states (CT, IL) do
specifically require foreign taxes paid to be added back with state and
local taxes in the computation of State Taxable Income, effectively
negating a deduction for these items. On the other hand, five states
(CO, MI, NC, ND, VT) that begin their calculation of State Taxable
Income with the amount reported on the taxpayer's federal return as
Federal Taxable Income, without requiring any upward adjustments for
foreign taxes paid, are implicitly allowing the taxpayer a deduction for
these taxes.
Credit for Foreign Taxes Paid
Sixteen states provide relief from the double taxation in the form
of a credit for the foreign taxes paid, either as a sole remedy (five
states) or as an alternative to a deduction (11 states). However, five
states (MA, MI, MN, NY, VT) restrict the credit to taxes paid to Canada
or Canadian provinces. Four states (KN, MA, MI, VT) limit the credit to
the foreign taxes that were actually paid in excess of the Foreign Tax
Credit allowed on the taxpayer's federal return. Indiana's
credit is only available for foreign taxes paid on capital gains,
interest, and dividend income.
Exemptions of Foreign Income
Iowa and Virginia are the only states that explicitly exempt
foreign earned income from state income taxation. Two other states (OK,
SC) specifically exempt income from out-of-state businesses and real or
tangible property, but not out-of-state wage income. In addition to
these specifically mentioned exemptions, any state which begins its
calculations with either Federal Adjusted Gross Income (31 states) or
Federal Taxable Income (5 states) from which "adjustments" are
made in order to arrive at State Taxable Income implicitly recognizes
the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion available under IRC Section 911.
[Note: although California and Hawaii begin their calculation of the
taxpayer's State Taxable Income with the Adjusted Gross Income
(AGI) reported on the federal income tax return, both explicitly
"adjust" (i.e., add) the Section 911 exclusion to arrive at
State Taxable Income.] v
Foreign Income Taxes: Treatment at State Level
Federal AGI as
State Deduction Credit Exemption No Relief Starting Point
AL X
AK (1)
AR X
AZ X X X X
CA X X
CO X X
CT X X
DE X X X
FL (1)
GA X X X
HI X X X
ID X X X
IL X X
IN X X X
IA X X X
KS X X X X
KY X X X
LA X X X
ME X X X X
MD X X X
MA X X
MN X X X X
MS X
MO X X X
MT X X X X
NE X X X
NV (1)
NH (1) X
NJ X
NM X X X
NY X X X
NC X X X
ND X X
OH X X
OK X X X
OR X X X
PA X
RI X X X X
SC X X
SD (1)
TN (1) X X
TX (1)
UT X X X
VT X X X X
VA X X X X
WA (1)
WV X X
WI X X
WY (1)
DC X X X
State
AL
AK (1)
AR
AZ
CA Foreign Earned Income Exemption
added back
CO Starts with Federal Taxable
Income
CT
DE
FL (1)
GA
HI Foreign Earned Income Exemption
added back
ID
IL
IN Credit for taxes paid on Capital
Gains, Int., and Div. income
only
IA
KS Credit is limited to excess of
foreign taxes paid over allowed
Federal Foreign Tax Credit
KY
LA Deduction subject to limitation-50%
of excess of Federal Standard
Deduction
ME Credit for taxes paid to Foreign
Foreign jurisdiction that is analogous
to a "state"
MD
MA Credit limited to excess
Canadian provincial taxes over allowed
Federal Foreign Tax Credit
MN Starts with Federal Taxable Income;
credit limited to Canadian provincial
taxes
MS
MO
MT
NE
NV (1)
NH (1) No relief from foreign tax on Int.
and Div. income
NJ
NM
NY Credit limited to Canadian
provincial taxes
NC Starts with Federal Taxable
Income
ND Starts with Federal Taxable
Income
OH Exclusion of income from
out-of-state business or
property
OK
OR
PA
RI
SC Exclusion of non-wage,
out-of-state income
SD (1) No relief from foreign
tax on Int. and Div. income
TN (1)
TX (1)
UT
VT Starts with Federal Taxable
Income; credit limited to
excess Canadian provincial
taxes over allowed Federal
Foreign Tax Credit
VA Specific exclusion of foreign
source income included in
Federal AGI
WA (1)
WV
WI
WY (1)
DC
(1)No State Income Tax.
Endnotes
(1.) Typical of the limitation of credit for taxes paid to other
States is included in the instruction to Illinois' Schedule CR:
"For purposes of this schedule, 'state' means any state
of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, or
political subdivision of any of these (e.g., county, city). The term
'state' does not refer to any foreign country.
W Richard Sherman, JD, LLM, CPA, is Associate Professor of
Accounting at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia, PA. Thomas
M. Brinker, Jr., JD, MS, CPA, is Associate Professor of Accounting at
Arcadia University in Glenside, PA.
COPYRIGHT 2002 National Society of Public
Accountants Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2002, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.