Creation of the Media.(Book review)
I. AN ANALYSIS OF CONSTITUTIVE MOTIVES
II. AN APPLICATION OF HISTORY
III. CONCLUSION
Paul Starr's Creation of the Media provides a rich history of
the social, political and legal . . .
Endangered species, lassoes, and unmet
promises.(Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten Years Later
Symposium)
I. INTRODUCTION
II. A LEARNING EXPERIENCE
III. DOING BETTER NEXT TIME
A. Endangered Species
B. Lassoes
C. Unmet Promises
IV. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
The Eighth Circuit, in . . .
The greatest story never told: how the 1996 Telecommunications
Act helped to transform cable's future.(Telecommunications Act of
It'll be 10-to-1 in our favor. I would say that by 2000,
we'll have 50 percent of the cable TV business--no doubt about it,
which is why some cable companies are in a panic. Meanwhile, the . . .
Deregulation and market concentration: an analysis of post-1996
consolidations.(Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten Years Later
I. THE ISSUE
II. THE CHANGING INDUSTRY STRUCTURE
III. EMPIRICAL FINDINGS
A. Vertical Concentration.
B. Local Concentration
IV. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
V. OUTLOOK
I. THE ISSUE
. . .
Rivalrous telecommunications networks with and without mandatory
sharing.(Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten Years Later
Sympos
I. INTRODUCTION
II. NETWORK SHARING RULES PURSUANT TO THE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996
III. TESTING THE "STEPPING STONE" THEORY
A. Growth in CLEC Lines
B. Cable Telephony: The Dog . . .
Editor's note.
Greetings! Welcome to Volume 59 of the Federal Communications Law
Journal, the nation's premier journal in communications law and the
official law journal of the Federal Communications Bar . . .
Responses by the Federal Communications Commission to
WorldCom's accounting fraud.(Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten
Years Lat
WorldCom's disclosure of billions of dollars of financial
fraud on June 25, 2002 challenged the Federal Communications Commission
("FCC") in several major ways. The FCC proclaimed its
commitment to . . .
Section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: beware of
intended consequences. (Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten Year
I. INTRODUCTION
II. JUDICIAL CONSTRUCTION OF SECTION 202(h)
III. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a story about a reasonably obscure provision of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("I 996 . . .
Swallows, sausages, and the 1996 Act.(Telecommunications Act of
1996: Ten Years Later Symposium)
In an annual ritual that rivals the swallows' return to
Capistrano in regularity, if not longevity, February in Washington is
heralded by a flock of commentary on why the Telecommunications Act . . .
The failure of competition under the 1996 Telecommunications
Act.(Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten Years Later Symposium)
I. INTRODUCTION
II. BY THE NUMBERS: FEEBLE COMPETITION
III. THE FUTURE
IV. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") replaced
the regulatory framework of . . .
Private eyes are watching you: with the implementation of the
E-911 mandate, who will watch every move you make?(Telecommunicati
The FCC's E-911 mandate, which will ensure that emergency
operators automatically receive a caller's location information,
should help save lives. However, privacy advocates have expressed
concern . . .
Transformation: the 1996 Act reshapes radio.(Telecommunications
Act of 1996: Ten Years Later Symposium)
I. INTRODUCTION
II. LICENSE RENEWALS
III. LOCAL OWNERSHIP
IV. NATIONAL OWNERSHIP
V. IMPACT AND OUTLOOK
I. INTRODUCTION
While the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act")
focused largely . . .
The 1996 Telecommunications Act.(Telecommunications Act of 1996:
Ten Years Later Symposium)
I. INTRODUCTION
II. THE 1996 ACT: A NEW HOPE
III. REFORM BUT WITH CAUTION
IV. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
Without a doubt, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996
Act") has been a triumph . . .
The law of unintended consequences. (Telecommunications Act of
1996: Ten Years Later Symposium)
Whether intentional or not, the 1996 Telecommunications Act
("1996 Act") was transitional legislation, focused largely on
the constituencies that battled before Congress at the time of its
passage, . . .
A public interest perspective on the impact of the broadcasting
provisions of the 1996 Act.(Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten
I. INTRODUCTION
II. SECTION 201: BROADCAST SPECTRUM FLEXIBILITY
III. SECTION 202: BROADCAST OWNERSHIP
IV. LICENSE RENEWAL PROVISIONS
V. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
The broadcasting . . .
Broadcast technology as diversity opportunity: exchanging market
power for multiplexed signal set-asides.
I. INTRODUCTION: PUBLIC ACCESS IN EXCHANGE FOR MARKET
POWER: TWO APPROACHES BASED ON QUID PRO QUO
II. IDENTIFYING THE PROBLEMS: LACK OF ACCESS, LACK OF
DIVERSITY
A. The Current . . .
'Wi-Fi'ght them when you can join them? How the
Philadelphia compromise may have saved municipally-owned
telecommunications serv
When the Mayor of Philadelphia announced his plan to provide
municipally sponsored Wi-Fi Internet access, Verizon, the incumbent
telecommunications service provider organized lobbyists to block . . .
Are you better off today than you were ten years ago? Residential
consumers and telecommunications reform.(Telecommunications Ac
I. INTRODUCTION
II. BROADBAND DEPLOYMENT
III. CONSUMER PROTECTION
IV. ACCESSIBILITY
V. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION
Five years ago I asked this question about the Telecommunications
Act of . . .
Politics and telecommunications. (Telecommunications Act of 1996:
Ten Years Later Symposium)
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") has
frequently been cited as landmark legislation. In fact in Tom
Friedman's bestselling book, The World Is Flat, cites the 1996 Act
as the basis for . . .
No sight like hindsight: the 1996 Act and the view ten years
later.(Telecommunications Act of 1996: Ten Years Later
Symposium)
I. INTRODUCTION
II. THE 1996 ACT: TRULY LANDMARK LEGISLATION
III. CONGRESS LOOKED BACK AND THOUGHT AHEAD
IV. WHAT WE CAN SEE IN HINDSIGHT: PITFALLS ON THE
COMPETITIVE ROAD
V. WHERE TO . . .
|
|