Read the Fine Print

... or you could get screwed.
Magazine Contributor
1 min read

This story appears in the March 1999 issue of Entrepreneur. Subscribe »

Contracts are a tricky business: One poorly written phrase can a lawsuit make. Just ask the claimants of Mermaid Marketing Inc. v. Esberg Corp.

In early 1998, Steve L. Smith, whose corporate entity, Esberg Corp., owned three Mermaid carwash franchises in Minnesota, wanted to buy a nonfranchised car wash in Bloomington, Minnesota. Madison, Wisconsin-based Mermaid denied consent, claiming proprietary trade secrets would be at risk. Smith fought Mermaid's refusal, citing his franchise agreement, which allows franchisees to operate nonfranchised car washes with consent, which Mermaid can't "unreasonably withhold."

After much litigation, an appellate court found the case would be better settled in a trial court. A trial date is expected to be set later this year.

"Many lawsuits turn on the specific language of the franchise agreement," says Barry M. Heller, a partner with the Washington, DC, franchise law firm Rudnick, Wolfe, Epstien & Zeidman. It's crucial to examine, question and understand every word of the franchise agreement to avoid misunderstandings.

Contact Source

Rudnick, Wolfe, Epstien, & Zeidman, (202) 712-7243, barry.heller@rudnickwolfe.com

My Queue

There are no Videos in your queue.

Click on the Add to next to any video to save to your queue.

There are no Articles in your queue.

Click on the Add to next to any article to save to your queue.

There are no Podcasts in your queue.

Click on the Add to next to any podcast episode to save to your queue.

You're not following any authors.

Click the Follow button on any author page to keep up with the latest content from your favorite authors.

How This Entrepreneur Built a Powerhouse Talent Management Company With a Soul