Hewlett-Packard in Hot Water Again Over Botched Acquisition
Grow Your Business, Not Your Inbox
Hewlett-Packard's ongoing acquisition controversy serves as a cautionary tale for entrepreneurs involved in buying another company or being acquired themselves. HP shareholders are now suing the personal computer giant for failing to properly vet the financial practices of Autonomy, the British software maker it acquired last year.
The lawsuit filed on Friday comes nearly six months after HP took an $8.8 billion writedown on Autonomy, signifying that HP believes the true market value of its new subsidiary is little more than one-tenth of the $10 billion it paid to purchase it in 2011. The writedown came after Palo Alto, Calif.-based HP alleged it had discovered dubious accounting practices within Autonomy.
In a statement emailed to Entrepreneur.com, HP says it trusted Autonomy's own financial statements and claims, as well as those of its auditors, to give an accurate picture of the British company's health. "Those facts and figures appear to have been willfully manipulated by certain Autonomy employees," says Michael Thacker, director of media relations for HP, in the statement.
Autonomy co-founder Mike Lynch, who is no longer with the company, has been vocal in his denial of HP's claims. "We continue to reject the allegations made against us by HP," Lynch said in an open letter published on his website in March. "We refuse to be a scapegoat for HP's own failings."
HP investors are angry. The shareholder lawsuit filed in federal court in San Francisco claims that HP failed to perform due diligence before making the acquisition. The complaint also accuses HP's leadership of misleading investors to cover up their own mistakes.
For its part, HP is contending that it has taken proper steps ever since learning last November of the alleged accounting scandal inside Autonomy. "We have handed over our information of serious misrepresentations in Autonomy's accounting to the proper authorities, namely the SEC and the Department of Justice and, in the U.K., the Serious Fraud Office," Thacker says. "We continue to cooperate and provide requested information to the relevant authorities on an ongoing basis."