Full access to Entrepreneur for $5
Subscribe

Bend the Rules

Are overtime laws too rigid? congress is looking at ways to increase their flexibility.

By
This story appears in the February 2003 issue of Entrepreneur. Subscribe »

It's high time for overtime reform-or at least that's the view of many small-business groups that are optimistic that this new Congress, with its Republican-controlled Senate, will pass changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). At the top of the list is modernizing the overtime provision of the 1938 law, which dictates that hourly workers be paid time-and-a-half beyond a 40-hour week.

Groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce want to give businesses and workers more flexibility by allowing employees to take time off in lieu of overtime pay. The logic is that, for example, parents might prefer extra time off to spend with children, either participating at school or staying home during a sickness, rather than extra pay. However, opponents of comp time, led by labor unions, argue employers would use comp time flexibility to force employees to take extra time off as a means of achieving payroll savings.

Continue reading this article -- and everything on Entrepreneur!

Become a member to get unlimited access and support the voices you want to hear more from. Get full access to Entrepreneur for just $5!