Word Games

Beware of ambiguous language in your contracts, and you'll avoid the headache of court battles.
Magazine Contributor
3 min read

This story appears in the June 2003 issue of Entrepreneur. Subscribe »

Owners of Carvel franchises in states were shocked when they discovered their franchisor, Carvel Corp. of Farmington, , had started selling its ice cream in supermarkets at prices that undercut the franchise stores. They thought their gave them protected territories. But when they hired attorneys to look into those contracts, they discovered the wording was ambiguous.

For instance, some contracts guaranteed the company would not establish other Carvel stores within a quarter mile of a Carvel franchise. But did a count as a Carvel store? A U.S. District ruled that because the contracts were ambiguous, it would be up to a to determine the intent of the company in drafting the contracts and the expectations of the franchisees who signed them.

Ambiguous language in contracts is a common problem, says Gregg Weiner, an attorney with Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver and Jacobson in New York City. have not established a standard for determining whether contract language is ambiguous or clear. Generally speaking, he says, the question is whether the language is objectively susceptible to more than one meaning. But appellate courts have overturned trial courts, disagreeing over whether a particular contract is ambiguous.

If a judge rules a contract is ambiguous, the matter goes to trial where the jury determines the meaning of the contract by examining not only the language of the contract itself but also other documents, such as letters, that might indicate the parties' intent. The dispute can take years to settle, draining energy that could be going toward building the business.

Make sure your contracts are clear and unambigous. Weiner advises having someone experienced with contract disputes-preferably a lawyer who specializes in contract litigation-go over contracts with an eye toward future problems.

Use language broad enough to cover circumstances that might arise, Weiner advises. For instance, a lease should address whether you have to pay rent if you don't have access to the space. "There might be a hundred reasons why you wouldn't have access to your space, [such as a] flood [or] a strike," he says. But even if you list as many as you can think of in the contract, something else could happen. So be sure that the meaning of the language is clear enough to govern the relationship when the unexpected happens.

Steven C. Bahls, dean of Capital University School in Columbus, Ohio, teaches entrepreneurship law. Freelance writer Jane easter Bahls specializes in business and legal topics.


More from Entrepreneur

Get heaping discounts to books you love delivered straight to your inbox. We’ll feature a different book each week and share exclusive deals you won’t find anywhere else.
Amplify your business knowledge and reach your full entrepreneurial potential with Entrepreneur Insider’s exclusive benefits. For just $5 per month, get access to premium content, webinars, an ad-free experience, and more! Plus, enjoy a FREE 1-year Entrepreneur magazine subscription.
Create your business plan in half the time with twice the impact using Entrepreneur's BIZ PLANNING PLUS powered by LivePlan. Try risk free for 60 days.

Latest on Entrepreneur