Why I Stopped Chasing Mega-Influencers: A Reality Check from My Marketing Agency's Pivot Why nano-influencers outperform mega-influencers: A first-hand look at shifting influencer marketing strategies.
By Giovanbattista Cimmino Edited by Jason Fell
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur Europe, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.

Last quarter, I made a decision that seemed counterintuitive: I turned down a potential client who wanted to spend six figures on mega-influencers for their launch. Six years ago, when I started my marketing agency in London, I would have jumped at this opportunity. But my experience managing more than 300 influencer campaigns has taught me something crucial: the future of influencer marketing isn't in star power—it's in authenticity and targeted reach.
A costly lesson in influencer selection
My journey to this realization was expensive. In 2024, my agency ran a campaign for a sustainable fashion brand using a fashion influencer with 2.3 million followers. The numbers looked promising: high engagement rates, strong follower demographics, and a solid content history. We spent £75,000 on the campaign. The result? A conversion rate of just 0.1% and a client who nearly dropped us.
This failure forced me to dig deeper into our campaign data. I discovered something surprising: our most successful campaigns weren't with mega-influencers at all. A series of nano-influencers we worked with in London and Manchester, each with only 3,000 to 7,000 followers, were generating conversion rates of 5% to 8% consistently.
The real numbers behind my strategy shift
Looking at my agency's internal data from the past year:
- Campaigns with influencers with less than 10,000 followers averaged 6.2% conversion rates.
- Mid-tier influencer campaigns (100,000+ followers) averaged 2.1%.
- Mega-influencer campaigns barely hit 0.5%.
What really caught my attention wasn't just the conversions—it was the cost. Our nano-influencer campaigns cost roughly £1,250 per influencer, while delivering better ROI than single mega-influencer partnerships costing £50,000 or more.
My three-step approach to modern influencer marketing
Through trial and error, I've developed a system that's now the backbone of every campaign I run:
1. The 72-hour content test
Before signing any influencer, I monitor their content engagement for 72 hours. I'm not looking at likes or follower counts. Instead, I track how their audience interacts with non-sponsored content. Last month, this approach helped me identify a food blogger with just 5,000 followers whose audience had a 22% comment-to-view ratio on cooking tutorials—perfect for my client's kitchen appliance launch.
2. The geographic deep dive
I've learned to prioritize geographic concentration over total reach. One of my most successful campaigns involved partnering with 12 nano-influencers in London for a local restaurant chain. Their combined following was just 85,000, but their local authority drove 1,800 restaurant visits in two weeks.
3. The authenticity contract
I now include a unique clause in my influencer contracts: they must have personally used the product for at least two weeks before posting. When a beauty influencer recently declined this requirement for a skincare campaign, I knew we'd dodged a bullet. The extra wait time has consistently led to more authentic content and better results.
Navigating platform changes
The recent shift in platform algorithms has reinforced my approach. When Instagram modified its engagement metrics last year, I watched as many of our mega-influencer partners saw their reach plummet. However, our nano-influencer network maintained steady engagement rates, largely because their followers were genuinely interested in their content.
Additionally, growing uncertainty around TikTok in the UK and elsewhere in Europe has impacted our strategy. Several clients have scaled back their investments due to increasing regulatory scrutiny, rising ad costs, and declining organic reach for branded content. As a result, we've diversified our approach, prioritizing smaller, niche influencers who continue to drive strong engagement and ROI.
Looking ahead: My 2025 strategy
Based on my experience, here's how I'm adapting my agency's approach for 2025:
Focusing on nano-influencers in specific geographic areas.
Implementing mandatory product testing periods before collaborations.
Building long-term partnerships instead of one-off posts.
Prioritizing engagement quality over follower quantity.
The future of influencer marketing isn't about reaching millions—it's about reaching the right hundred or thousand people who truly care about your message. This approach requires more work, more relationship building, and more attention to detail. But in my experience, it's the only sustainable way forward in an increasingly saturated market.
Remember when I mentioned that six-figure client I turned down? They ended up working with another agency on their mega-influencer campaign. Last week, they called me back, asking if we could help them rebuild their strategy with local nano-influencers instead. Sometimes, the best business decisions aren't about following trends—they're about following results.