Abusive managers at work.
by Mercurio, Nancy
Barbara was amidst her peers in meeting an important deadline on a
high visibility project that would be critical to her boss'
reputation, as well as the department.
It was important to Barbara's boss that she and others do
whatever it takes to secure a timely completion, which is exactly what
Barbara did. She worked tirelessly, two to four hours extra each day
onsite, and even took work home she could finish after tending to her
family's needs.
Throughout the project, Barbara's boss was stressed. In every
update discussion they had, Barbara's boss made derogatory
comments, implying her lack of faith in Barbara and her ability to
deliver.
Barbara understood that her boss was under a lot of pressure
however, anticipating her boss' behaviors and reactions prevented
her from fully concentrating on the work at hand. Whenever the update
calls were scheduled to occur, Barbara fretted over what negative
comments she might hear this time.
Even worse was that these negative comments about Barbara were made
during conference calls with her peers present. Although these peers
were receiving similar negative reinforcement about themselves, the
experience was no less embarrassing for Barbara.
While the project was successfully completed on time, Barbara and
her teammates were depleted of their enthusiasm. Crossing the finish
line was devoid of a victory celebration, and Barbara eventually left
the organization.
Barbara is one of thousands of employees who experience the daily
frustration of working for a boss who uses negative reinforcement to
motivate subordinates. Managers who rule with such abusive tactics,
failing to exhibit trust in their staff, minimize individual value and
contributions.
The Institute for Organizational Performance states that
'trust alone predicts 46 percent of the difference between low and
high performers'. Without trust, few individuals are willing to
contribute their best. What makes the least sense is why any manager
would want less than 100% from the people they hire?
What constitutes abusive behaviors?
There was a time when abusive behaviors were defined as those that
were most obvious; yelling, slamming office doors, firing people on the
spot unfairly. However, as the laws evolved to protect employees from
unfair practices, the tendency of managers to use 'less
obvious', abusive practices has increased.
Worse yet is that subjecting employees to sustained negative
reinforcement has more long-term damaging affects than the occasional
outbursts or over-reactive responses.
Some people think abuse is violent behavior, when in fact, synonyms
for abuse also include: ill-treatment, mistreatment, misuse, cruelty,
and exploitation.
There are managers who avoid confrontation by making joking
comments to get their points across, believing that this practice is
somehow less abusive. A comment such as, don't hold your breath
while waiting for a call from Frank, is made in hopes that Frank will
take the hint that his manager wants to hear from him more frequently.
Or perhaps a manager makes a statement such as avoid talking to Sue in
the morning before her coffee, hoping Sue gets the idea that
communicating with her in the morning is difficult.
While both Frank and Sue may be in the wrong, using abusive tactics
to mold positive behaviors is still 'abusive', regardless of
how you spin it.
Another very common practice is making threats as to the
consequences of taking earned vacation during times that are
inconvenient for the manager. Many employees spend their entire
vacations logging in and checking emails or taking calls, not because
they choose to, but rather because they have been told to. Placing
conditions on an employee's earned time off is an abusive practice.
There is a growing tendency towards these subtle and inappropriate
practices because they are less obvious to others and less likely to be
reported to Human Resources. Many employees believe that their
boss' title gives them the permission to behave in such a manner.
Most important to highlight here is that any action that elicits
less than a 100% contribution from an employee is simply a waste of time
and money. There is zero value in hiring an employee and behaving in any
way that prevents the employee from being loyal and wanting to
contribute 100% to their boss, and to the organization.
How can you avoid abusive behaviors?
Clearly, the key factor is in how communications occur between
manager and employee.
Step 1: Communicate honestly and in a timely fashion.
Be honest with employees at all times-when you are pleased and when
you are displeased, and be sure to do so at the time of the pleasure or
displeasure, or soon thereafter. Waiting until official performance
review times or for the 'official talk' disseminates trust and
respect.
Step 2: Eliminate personal opinions and judgments.
What you want or think is irrelevant. All communications should be
focused on the following:
* What was asked or required?
* What specific actions are of concern?
* What is the corrective action needed?
* When is the corrective action expected?
Avoid the following:
* What you think you said or did;
* Why you don't like what the person did;
* What you would have done.
In every situation, offering observations is safer than opinions.
3: Maintain a balance between positive and negative feedback.
At the end of the day or week, mentally review the various
conversations you have had with any subordinate. The number of times you
provided positive or encouraging feedback should equal, or be close to,
the number of negative or corrective interactions.
Step 4: Be an observer.
Monitor your actions and the responses you receive from others by
simply being an observer of your own behaviors. We all know when we have
spoken or acted without consideration of outcomes. Observing and
correcting your behaviors regularly will help maintain a balanced style.
The demands of today's lifestyle and costs associated with
housing, family, etc., do not afford many people the luxury of
unemployment. Unfortunately, that can mean tolerating the behaviors of
an abusive boss just to maintain a paycheck.
If you are a manager, the questions to ask yourself are as follows:
* Do your employees respect and trust you?
* Do they serve you and the organization willingly?
* Are you eliciting the best performance from your staff?
* Would you want to hear what they say about you to others?
Let's work towards changing the tendency towards abusive
practices, and gain the loyalty and respect necessary to drive
successful organizations.
Nancy Mercurio is President and co-owner of Leadership Training
Systems Inc. (nmercurio@leadershiptrainingsys.com) and has 25 years
experience as a business entrepreneur. She is author of Leadership With
a Heart--The Human Side of Management, and Mastering Individual
Effectiveness and is an internationally recognized consultant and
televised trainer, whose expertise is in human relations and
organizational behaviour.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Canadian Institute of
Management Reproduced with permission of the copyright holder. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights
reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.
NOTE: All illustrations and photos have been removed from this article.