What is the appropriate structure for international expansion?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of using the following structures for a United States-based retail clothing business when selling products to other countries (Canada being the first point of entry): wholly owned retail outlets, joint ventures, franchises, or distributor arrangements. Please address legal, tax, regulatory and broader strategic ramifications.
Position yourself for growth in 2017—join us live at the Entrepreneur 360™.
Flash Sale—save up to $200 on registration. Ends Thursday. Secure Your Seat »
Now, if you're moving further afield, you have to start to entertain the JV, franchise or distribution agreements. The biggest decision here is also strategic: Do you want the OS stores to be under your company name or do you want to just sell your clothing through other retailers?
I'll assume you want your own names. Personally, I prefer using franchises because I like the flexibility it brings and the capital that comes with each new store owner.
With franchising, you can also incorporate a JV into some of the bigger foreign language countries. Remember this: The way countries like England, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand do business is similar to doing business in the states and should be franchised directly.
When it comes to tax and regulations, franchises generally allow you to make sales directly from your home base in the states and you'll only have to think about withholding tax in the other jurisdictions.
All the Best