Join our Waitlist for Expert Advice!

Why Your Enterprise Should Aim For Transformation, And Not Change Transformation creates attractive futures, while change mends the past.

By Vip Vyas

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

You're reading Entrepreneur Middle East, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.

Shutterstock.com

This article was co-authored with Diego Nannicini, Associate Consultant, Distinctive Performance.

In May 2018, Google CEO Sundar Pichai unveiled Google Duplex, a new virtual AI assistant with a hyper-realistic voice. Attendees of this year's Google I/O conference listened to a recording of Duplex making a hair salon appointment, then a restaurant reservation. Both conversations were so natural that the humans on the phone probably had no clue they were talking to an AI entity.

Within hours, videos of the presentation went viral, racking up millions of hits. The world had just witnessed a stunning transformation. A multitude of possibilities immediately flooded the minds of viewers. A new future in the field of human-machine interaction had begun.

Distinguishing transformation from change

The words "transformation" and "change" are often used interchangeably. Moreover, transformation, once considered inspirational, is now viewed suspiciously- a codeword for technology, cost cutting and ending of careers. Conflating these two important concepts blurs what each one can do.

While change seems future-oriented, it is firmly embedded in the past. It often tries to produce a better version of what already exists. Attachment to the past shows up in the language used in organisations. How often have you heard?

  • It's a complex M&A, probably the hardest we have ever made
  • Leadership needs to be more agile
  • Our response times need to be faster
  • We need greater presence on social media

These comparatives require a reference point in the past. When it comes to organisational change, the constraints of the past are built into the change process. Indeed, many leaders experience a heavy drag, or resistance, when trying to drive change. To wit, in some organisations, the term 'change initiative' is sarcastically referred to as 'it ain't gonna happen.'

The striking contrasts

The following table shows the many ways 'transformation' contrasts with 'change.'

Transformation

Change

Invents and creates an attractive future

Fixes or mends the past

Designs new fields of performance by creating new uncontested market advantage

Tries to improve performance by ameliorating the quality of players and products on the existing field

Generates a fundamental shift in perspective that activates the imagination and leads to insight

Takes a step-by-step programmatic approach in attempting to get from state A to state B

Asks "what if?"

Asks "what's wrong?"

Often triggers thoughts such as:

"What else is possible?"

"Can we see exponential unmet needs?"

"How could this be adapted?"

Often triggers thoughts such:

"Not another change initiative…"

"When will it end?

"What does this mean for me?"

Nokia's attachment to the past

No example demonstrates the addiction to changing the past better than the colossal downfall of Nokia. Valued at over US$250 billion at its peak in 2000, it ended up selling its phone business, the core of its operations, for only US$7.2 billion in 2013.

Many factors contributed to Nokia's failure, but it was the inferiority of the Symbian system, the operating heart of the Nokia phones, which led consumers to turn to Apple and Samsung. Put simply, Nokia completely missed the importance of software. While the company focused on ameliorating its hardware, Apple saw the transformative potential of the touchscreen and the app ecosystem.

A transformational moment, similar to that of Pichai's Duplex demonstration, took place when Steve Jobs went on stage to introduce the revolutionary iPhone in January 2007, revolutionising the mobile phone market.

As Nokia started to lose market share to Apple, the Finnish multinational continued to focus on change. It clung onto its relatively Neanderthal operating system, trying to upgrade it, so it could compete with Apple's iOS. Launching a major upgrade to an operating system is a complicated process that typically takes several years. Despite this reality, senior management remained fixated on pulling the proverbial rabbit out of the hat.

The transformative process

Transformation is based on the assertion that the future is generated through actions taken in the present moment. The pre-requisite for transformation is a willingness to identify and surface the axioms, fundamental beliefs and cognitive constraints that underpin a corporation's relative competitive success.

Tackling these questions enables the organisation to pinpoint what puts a lid on possibilities. From a practical and experiential standpoint, the hidden part of the iceberg shows up in the ideas and conversations that are considered safe vs. unsafe.

In the case of Nokia, research showed that its fear-driven leadership approach killed the possibility of authentic dialogue within the business. For example, teaming with another software vendor to come up with an alternate touch screen design in response to the iPhone wasn't considered until it was too late.

The importance of building transformative capability advantages

In a disruptive world, corporate survival will increasingly depend on the ability of firms to transform themselves. This is especially true for traditional businesses that have experienced a long-term decline of their operating margin and must now rejuvenate their core business. Corning is an example of a company that transformed itself. The 167-year-old firm that used to make glass enclosures for light bulbs has successfully expanded and innovated into areas such as optical communications, display glass, advanced optics and pharmaceutical applications.

In my experience helping senior executives transform complex global organisations, I have found that companies often mistakenly work on change when the real unarticulated need is for transformation. In practice, transformation or change is not an either-or game. But every firm needs to be clear about what it's working on.

Related: Initiating Innovation: Furthering The Role Of HR In Change Management

Vip Vyas

CEO, Distinctive Performance

Vip Vyas is the CEO of Distinctive Performance.

Vip Vyas is best known for his ability to partner with senior executives to catalyse breakthrough shifts in performance. With over 20 combined years’ experience in the Oil & Gas and Mega-Infrastructure sectors, he has particular expertise in building High Performance Alliances, Joint-Ventures and Strategic Consortia where performance depends on building collaborative environments that satisfy a diverse range of stakeholder interests in complex settings.

Most recently Vip has been focussed on de-risking performance of large, complex projects and increasing project certainty; and is in the process of authoring a ground-breaking book on the subject. Vip has been a Visiting Consultant at the London Business School and studied Strategy and Execution at the Harvard Business School.

Starting a Business

She Started a Business With $300 After Getting Laid Off. It Made $300,000 in Year 1 and Became a Multimillion-Dollar Company.

Bobbie Racette wanted to revamp the virtual assistance space — and provide job opportunities for underrepresented communities at the same time.

Growth Strategies

GymNation to Accelerate Expansion Following the Opening of Its 20th Location

"The GCC fitness market is growing at 15-20% a year, and we have invested in our company infrastructure to grow at pace and capitalize on what we feel is a generational opportunity to open 100 gyms across the region in the next 3-5 years."

Starting a Business

How to Find the Right Programmers: A Brief Guideline for Startup Founders

For startup founders under a plethora of challenges like timing, investors and changing market demand, it is extremely hard to hire programmers who can deliver.

Growing a Business

How 15 People in Their 20s Built Million-Dollar Businesses

Think you're too young to start a business? These inspiring young entrepreneurs built companies that are making the world a kinder, more fun place for all of us.

Thought Leaders

How a Hockey Player Making Less Than $30,000 a Year Turned His Career Upside Down and Started a Multimillion-Dollar Day Trading Company

Despite playing in some of the best leagues in the world, James Sixsmith was broke. So he started a side hustle to create a life after the game.