Bill Battle
Can restructuring save a program that helps entrepreneurs but hurts the budget?
A Senior House Republican is leading efforts to replace an SBA
VC program that has spilled copious red ink since the dotcom boom
went bust. The Small Business Investment Company (SBIC)
Participating Securities (PS) program made speculative, mostly
equity investments in entrepreneurial startups with little access
to VC funds, either because of their locations (outside Silicon
Valley, Boston and a few other places) or their business types
(non-IT, nonsoftware, etc.). The supposedly self-supporting program
has lost about $2.7 billion since the tech bubble burst.
The Bush administration wants to drop the program entirely. But
Rep. Don Manzullo (R-IL), chairman of the House Small Business
Committee, is trying to restructure it instead. He introduced the
SBIC Participating Debenture Act of 2005 (H.R. 3429) in July. It
would convert the PS program into a Participating Debentures (PD)
program. SBICs would have to repay the SBA out of their revenue for
the interest payments the SBA makes on their behalf to
institutional investors, who buy debentures.
Lee Mercer, president of the National Association of Small
Business Investment Companies, says the bill assures that a new PD
program would be self-supporting. But the Bush administration
thinks the bill has some weaknesses. Jaime A. Guzmán-Fournier,
associate administrator for the SBA's Office of Investment,
says the PS program may have too many structural problems to risk
trying to resuscitate it.
Content Continues Below
How do entrepreneurs feel about it? Mark A. Redding, CEO of
Banner Services Corp., a metal products manufacturer with 60
employees in Carol Stream, Illinois, says he could not have
purchased the then-failing company in 2003 without equity from the
PS program. He says, "Now, a viable small business, formerly
in decline, is regenerating itself after 44 years in
business."
Stephen Barlas is a freelance business reporter who covers
the Washington beat for 15 magazines.