You Be the Judge
Are tax incentives to attract businesses unconstitutional?
In late September, the Supreme Court agreed to hear an Ohio case
on state tax incentives, and its decision could affect similar
incentive programs nationwide. The suit was brought by three
separate plaintiffs, each alleging that incentives provided by the
state of Ohio to DaimlerChrysler AG to build a manufacturing
facility in the state were unconstitutional.
The decision, says Walter Hellerstein, professor of law at the
University of Georgia School of Law, "has tremendous
implications for the constitutionality of the garden-variety credit
against income tax liability for new equipment. Many states have
that kind of credit." Those states could find their incentive
programs running afoul of commerce law.
But where do small businesses stand on the case? Typically, the
business community as a whole supports incentives because they
attract investments. But some programs have investment thresholds
that make small businesses ineligible to receive them, says Jeffrey
Finkle, president and CEO of the International Economic
Development Council, a nonprofit organization based in
Washington, DC, that helps economic developers do their jobs more
effectively. However, "Small businesses end up paying a larger
percentage of their revenue or income in taxes to make up for the
incentives," says Finkle.
Content Continues Below
On the other hand, some states have tweaked their incentives
programs to make them more accessible to smaller companies, says
Jones Hooks, president and CEO of Virginia's Hampton Roads Economic
Development Alliance. Hooks adds that smaller businesses can
often be indirect beneficiaries of big-business incentives, since
those players in turn buy supplies from or contract work to smaller
companies.
This case, which has yet to be heard, won't decide which
incentive programs discriminate against small businesses, but it
will raise the question of the constitutionality of tax incentives.
"That may be good news or bad news to a particular small
business," says Hellerstein. "One person's tax
incentive is another person's discriminatory tax. That's
always going to be the case."