Do the Top 1% Really Cheat on Their Taxes?

Does paying little to no taxes make you a tax cheat?

Free Book Preview Tax and Legal Playbook

Get game-changing solutions to your small business questions.
Entrepreneur Leadership Network Contributor
CPA, Author and Founder and CEO of WealthAbility
3 min read
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

There has long been a notion that because many of the top 1% pay little to no taxes that they are cheating, but is that the reality? To many, that assertion seems logical, but those who understand the  know that the top 1% is in fact being rewarded by the for stimulating the

How the 1% pays so little in taxes

If you’re not familiar with tax law, it’s important to know that it is written as a series of incentives for owners and investors because those specific activities spur economic growth. As a result, the top 1% use the opportunities presented in the tax laws to legally reduce their taxes. So it's not exactly cheating; these individuals hire tax strategists to help them work within the bounds of the law to reduce their taxes to zero.

Related: How Will the Biden Tax Plan Affect Your Small Business?

Avoidance and evasion are different

To accuse clients of cheating with no knowledge of their finances other than the fact that they make a significant amount of money is accusing CPAs of cheating. CPAs have an ethical standard, a license standard and an standard, and no credible would risk their license to support cheating. A CPA will help a client avoid taxes, not evade them and to equate the two is dangerous. Evasion is illegal, avoidance methods like and credits are what taxpayers are supposed to claim. In my experience, most tax cheating is done by middle income taxpayers via undocumented charitable deductions and taking personal expenses as business deductions. Typically, as supported by IRS studies, most cheating happens on a Schedule C used by sole proprietors.

Tax incentives aren’t loopholes

Tax incentives are a tool used by the government to promote particular actions; they are not a loophole. Loopholes are unintended consequences, while incentives are opportunities with intended consequences. For example, if we weren’t allowed to take a mortgage deduction, people wouldn’t have an incentive to buy homes. If we weren’t given to take education tax credits, people wouldn’t have the same incentive to send kids to college. Tax credits have long been used to specifically promote many social programs as well as economic activities.

To put it simply, it’s far more likely that the majority of the 1% are legally following the current tax law as it is written. If lawmakers would like them to pay more in taxes, they will need to change the law to eliminate the many existing incentives.

Related: What Is Modern Monetary Theory?

More from Entrepreneur
Our Franchise Advisors will guide you through the entire franchising process, for FREE!
  1. Book a one-on-one session with a Franchise Advisor
  2. Take a survey about your needs & goals
  3. Find your ideal franchise
  4. Learn about that franchise
  5. Meet the franchisor
  6. Receive the best business resources
Entrepreneur Insider members enjoy exclusive access to business resources for just $5/mo:
  • Premium articles, videos, and webinars
  • An ad-free experience
  • A weekly newsletter
  • Bonus: A FREE 1-year Entrepreneur magazine subscription delivered directly to you
Make sure you’re covered for physical injuries or property damage at work by
  • Providing us with basic information about your business
  • Verifying details about your business with one of our specialists
  • Speaking with an agent who is specifically suited to insure your business

Latest on Entrepreneur