If pay-per-click advertising makes sense for your business (and it does for most), then you're probably already using Google AdWords. But chances are you've only dabbled with Yahoo! and Bing advertising. If that's the case, it may be time to take a closer look at your options. The partnership between Yahoo! and Bing--announced last July--is about to become a reality this fall in the form of a combined pay-per-click platform that will give small-business advertisers an alternative to Google.
Microsoft hopes the partnership will lead to increased search volume, which in turn will attract advertisers to its ad platform. "You need a lot of advertisers to provide the most relevant advertising experience. You don't want to show an ad for 'Tacoma plumber' when a visitor is searching for a plumber in Seattle. The only way to create a market to attract more advertisers is to have a product with a high volume of searchers using it," says Matt Lydon, general manager of Microsoft advertising.
Will Bing and Yahoo! succeed? That's anyone's guess. But in the meantime, here are seven compelling reasons to give advertising on Bing a shot:
- Bid prices are lower.
Google has been around far longer and has a more robust advertising marketplace. The result is a saturated marketplace. For any given keyword, there can be dozens--sometimes even hundreds--of companies bidding for placement on the first page of search results. Currently, that line is shorter on Bing, and as a result advertisers can expect to pay less for placement on most keywords.
- Conversion rates are better (sometimes).
Google and Bing reach different audiences. Google is the default search engine for most people, so your Google ads are going to appear to a wider demographic. While you can expect your Google campaigns to get plenty of traffic, it typically takes a lot of work to bring conversion rates up to an acceptable level. You won't get nearly as much traffic from Bing, but you'll get access to the MSN audience. This can translate into higher sales for certain types of businesses. Compared to Google users, MSN users are older (the bulk are in the 25-54 age range, as opposed to Google's audience, which ranges from 13-34) and primarily female (57 percent vs. 50 percent).These are the customers of choice for most B2C marketers.
In addition, you can use AdCenter to target specific MSN properties to reach specific markets. For instance, MSN's celebrity gossip portal reaches affluent females between the ages 35-49--customers of choice for many B2C businesses. (For a breakdown of MSN user demographics see the AdCenter Lab.)
- Better customer support for small accounts.
Google advertisers who spend more than $500,000 per year have a dedicated account representative who can help with the various technical and billing problems that pop up from time to time. The rest of us have to settle for offshore support which can be, ahem, a less-than-satisfying experience.
Bing is attempting to woo the little guy with a higher level of customer support for small advertisers. Aside from being able to talk to an account rep, small advertisers can take advantage of the Quick Launch program, a service that provides you with free advertising consulting. The only requirement is that you spend at least $500 per month--a figure most of us can easily meet.
- Search traffic is about to grow. According to Comscore, Google's search share in May was around 64 percent compared with Bing's paltry 12 percent. If you've advertised on Bing already, you've probably seen the effects of this when looking at your campaign reports.
However, the new partnership will bring Yahoo!'s and Bing's combined traffic to more than 30 percent--nearly half of AdWords. This kind of traffic can provide a serious bump to anyone's PPC campaign. - Advertisers who prepare their campaigns ahead of the partnership will have an advantage over those who wait.
Both Google and Bing require advertisers to establish an account history before their ads will show to a wide audience. On Google, this process can take a few weeks to six months (or longer, depending on how established your competitors are). The same will ultimately be true on Bing.
Right now, however, there are relatively few advertisers, so account history is easy to establish. Once the Yahoo! migration is complete (tentatively planned for this fall), it will be much more difficult. So get your campaigns ready now.
- You can import your Google campaigns directly into Bing.
Google and Yahoo! have some annoying differences that make it impossible to simply copy-and-paste a campaign between the two. For instance, Yahoo! has a 40-character title limit while Google's is 25. Yahoo!'s minimum bid is a penny, while Google's is a nickel.
Bing is eliminating these legacy features and standardizing based on Google's ad formats, match types and minimum prices. This means you'll be able to import your Google AdWords campaigns into Bing and Yahoo! almost verbatim.
- It's just plain smart to diversify.
If you've been advertising on AdWords for some time, you may have been hit with the dreaded "Google slap." If Google determines that your website is of poor quality, that your ad is a bad match for a particular keyword, or even that your landing page loads too slowly, the company may make changes to your account or even shut it down entirely. Sometimes these slaps are subtle, and other times Google runs amok and shuts down thousands of advertisers at once. (The company banned more than 30,000 accounts during the December '09 wave, and even more were affected by the July '07 quality score update.)
This unpredictability is, hands down, the single biggest complaint advertisers have with AdWords. More than a few companies have gone out of business because they relied solely on Google for web traffic. This is a critical mistake--one that is difficult to recover from once it happens. Adding a second PPC source to the mix diversifies your traffic and reduces the chance that you'll wake up one day to find your website has become a ghost town.
Microsoft is betting big on its future in search advertising and investing heavily in a combined platform that is starting to look like a compelling choice over AdWords. If you've been sitting on the fence, now might the time to take a chance on something new . . . before your competitors do.


















Life insurance as low as $14/mo for $250,000 or $21/mo for $500,000 of coverage. Contact MetLife®









Comments:
I just started an ad campaign with Microsoft Ads (Bing/Yahoo) and I like the results I'm seeing so far, more traffic and, most important, more sales. I'll be doing more business with them and less with the others.
Yup, Bing has got the point. But I prefer to lok at it as at an additional promotion channel rather than replacement for Google. And PPC results from Bing are fascinating indeed.
I've used google adwords and I find that their conversion rates are quite good although I have a hard time swallowing how pricey CPC can get. If we could only find a platform with the conversion rates of google but with a little lower CPC that would be a great combination. I think that Yahoo/Bing will slowly catch up to google adwords and they will be a force to be reckoned with the near future. htttp://www.autoinsuranceforcheap.com/quote/
Great information thanks for the post
Bing maybe good if you are advertising on a national level but Google brings in more traffic national and local. Google also increases your spending threshold faster.
I am glad that Bing and Yahoo now merged together to compete with Google. I am in ppc network for last 5 years and found that former MSN and Yahoo ppc user interfaces were not User friendly as compare to Google and no doubt very smart interface still they have. But I will definitely try to use this New Combined ppc network. Thanks So Much Bing and Yahoo! Furqan Durvesh CEO | Webiff Solutions http://www.webiff.com
We have been advertising on yahoo, bing, google, facebook and all.. and out of all like google's extensive interface, keyword tool.. it's just unbeatable... It took like a week for microsoft to approve my ad which took like 10 minutes on google!! ... however, to be frank... i ultimately found that ppc is just way too costly... i believe it's only for companies who can spend like 1/2 million a year on such things... and how do they balance this cost? ... by selling at higher price!! ... so who gets the slap??... it's the consumers!! large corps who can spend big amounts on advertising attract the masses but in order to cover the costs they increase their prices... the irony is that in this whole mess, smaller players never get to see the light of the web!... they just die because they can't bid at such higher rates even if they have good product... in the end it all boils down to creating a good product and spreading the news by word of mouth... that's the real reality! I know I might be only showing one side of the coin... but well... that's an important side too... James www.ellipsisdive.com
I tried Yahoo PPC before the BING merge and found that their claimed Clicks did not matched what was happening in my Analytics reports. They claimed they were sending 200 clicks and charging me for 200 clicks, but my stats we saying I had only receive 5 to 10 visitors. So I paused the account until the merge. I also did not find much of a discount over Google Adwords, which I was expecting. I think I'll give it another try and see if the situation has improved.
Thanks for the post! I've used Bing and found that they weren't really reaching my target audience as Google did for the reasons that you mentioned above but I found them fantastic to deal with. I'd be more than happy to dump Google entirely because of the customer support they don't have.
Enough of Google Monopoly! Let new Giants come in!
Great knowledgeable source of information like always! thanks for this!
As an avid search user and Microsoft Advertising employee, I see this merger as an excellent chance for search advertisers to really have their advertising budgets justify their ROI's. This is a fantastic,ever-changing program that will constantly provide you with a satisfactory experience, if you are advertising with Google get on board the Bing train today, it will not disappoint. (BTW, the endorsement is genuine I am not getting paid for it!)
What I see most appealing is the support offered by the Yahoo! / Bing deal. With a $6k a year requirement for the Quick Launch program I think this will entice many business owners that may just be overwhelmed just trying to figure out how to run an ad campaign. This support could parlay into larger accounts as more and more small business owners understand how the game works and start realizing some benefits along the way.
It is very interesting and diversifying you advertising dollars between the search engines could be a good option, but I think it would be a horrible idea to invest all of a companies marketing dollars into a campaign that at best will provide half of the results of Adwords. I see it being a quick fix without long term result. What does everyone think?
Great information! Thanks for this.
Good data to know. Google has ruled the mountain for some time - glad to see that Microsoft is taking this seriously.