California Just Passed a Bill Granting Franchisees New Rights New California legislation makes it more difficult for franchisors to terminate franchise agreements and easier for franchisees to sell their locations.

By Kate Taylor

entrepreneur daily

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Chalk this one up as a big win for franchisees and a big loss for franchisors.

California's State Assembly passed a bill on Thursday that expands franchisee rights, making it significantly more difficult for a franchisor to terminate franchise agreements. The bill passed by a vote of 41 to 27 and has returned to the state Senate for final approval.

The SB 610 bill requires franchisors to provide evidence of a "substantial and material breach on the part of the franchisee of a lawful requirement of the franchise agreement" prior to terminating a franchisee. It additionally prohibits franchise agreements that bar a franchisee from selling or transferring a franchise.

Franchisee groups such as the American Association of Franchisees and Dealers (AAFD), the Coalition of Franchise Associations (CFA) and the Asian American Hotel Owners Association (AAHOA) argue that the bill is necessary to protect franchisees. Franchisees hope the bill has the power to cut "churning," a ploy in which franchisors terminate franchise agreements and resell locations to cash in on fresh franchise fees.

"Modern franchise relationships are most always governed by one-sided "take it or leave it' adhesion contracts that elicit substantial monetary investment from franchise owners, but severely limit a franchisee's rights in the franchise relationship," the AAFD said in a statement in June. "SB-610, as amended in 2014, takes a small but important step in recognizing and protecting franchisee rights."

The bill also received some somewhat surprising support from labor activists. The Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a labor union most recently noted for its financial backing of fast food strikes across the U.S., launched the website Franchisee Fairness and released a number of radio ads supporting SB 610.

Outside of its efforts with SB 610, SEIU has also supported measures that limit or draw attention to the limitations of franchisees' independence. In July, the union supported The National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) designation of McDonald's as a joint employer for workers at franchised restaurants, a decision opposed by both franchisors and many franchisees.

Related: Regulator Names McDonald's a 'Joint Employer'

In the case of SB 610, the SEIU argues that if franchisees are given increased freedom, both franchisees and employees will benefit.

"With greater protections from unfair corporate practices and costs, these small businesses will have the ability to treat their workers right," states the SEIU-backed Franchisee Fairness website.

While employees and franchisees may support the bill, it comes as a blow for franchisors with locations in California. Franchisors and the International Franchise Association (IFA) argue that the new bill makes it more difficult for franchises to protect their brand reputation by terminating franchisees when the relationship goes sour. Opponents to the bill claim that it could scare potential franchisees from expanding in California and rack up litigation costs for franchisors and franchisees.

Recent lawsuits have directed national attention to the franchise model, highlighting tension in franchisee-franchisor relationships. One such case that is particularly notable with the passage of SB 610 is Californian 7-Eleven franchisees' lawsuit against their franchisor.

The franchisees argue that South Asian franchisees have been forced out of the system as a part of a profit scheme by corporate 7-Eleven offices. Meanwhile, 7-Eleven attests that certain franchisees needed to be terminated due to violations of their franchise agreements that threatened the company's profits and the 7-Eleven brand.

Had SB 610 been in place prior to 7-Eleven's termination of franchisees involved in the lawsuit, these store owners may still be running shops across California. Or, the franchisees may have been terminated, with a great deal more effort on 7-Eleven's part.

In any case, under SB 610 Californian franchisees will rest a little easier, knowing that their rights as franchisees just got a little stronger.

Related: Franchisees Take 7-Eleven to Court for Alleged Racial Discrimination

Kate Taylor

Reporter

Kate Taylor is a reporter at Business Insider. She was previously a reporter at Entrepreneur. Get in touch with tips and feedback on Twitter at @Kate_H_Taylor. 

Want to be an Entrepreneur Leadership Network contributor? Apply now to join.

Editor's Pick

Related Topics

Side Hustle

Getting Laid Off Allowed Him to Focus on His Sentimental Side Hustle. Now He's on Track to Earn Over $700,000 in 2024.

Alaa El Ghatit wasn't fulfilled at his day job. So he started LifeOnRecord to help people record memories and well wishes.

Social Media

With This LinkedIn Algorithm Change, Your Best Posts Could Reach New Readers for Months

It's one of many new features rolling out on the platform in 2024.

Side Hustle

20 Side Hustle Ideas for Summer 2024: Part One

Instead of spending money this summer, prepare now to make extra cash through the following side hustles while still enjoying your free time.

Thought Leaders

Why Successful People Never Second Guess Themselves — and 5 Strategies to Help You Get Rid of Indecision

Making smart and swift decisions is a hallmark of success. But how do we do it well?

Business News

Should CEOs Take a Pay Cut to Avoid Layoffs and Cutting Jobs? It's Complicated, Experts Say

Former Nintendo CEO Satoru Iwata famously took a 50% pay cut in 2013 to avoid layoffs and pay employee salaries.

Growing a Business

9 Hidden Reasons Your Customers Will Leave You

Understanding why customers are leaving your business takes attention, not assumptions. Read on for proven ways to catch issues early and keep more clients around for the long run.