Private Equity and Entrepreneurs: Allies in Productivity (Opinion) Private-equity firms are in the spotlight thanks to Mitt Romney. But they don't deserve the blame they get for destroying jobs any more than young breakouts like Google, says Scott Shane.

By Scott Shane

entrepreneur daily

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Private Equity and Entrepreneurs: Allies in ProductivityMitt Romney's presidential campaign has brought private equity into the spotlight. Critics of the industry charge that it is bad for the economy. Private-equity firms, they say, simply buy companies, fire workers, chop the business into pieces, sell the viable parts and throw the remainder on the bankruptcy heap.

But careful analysis shows that private equity is just another form of entrepreneurship, with the firms profiting from finding opportunities to restructure businesses and generate value.

Few dispute that private-equity firms make money for their investors. One study of private- equity earnings by Bob Harris, a professor at the Darden School of Business at the University of Virginia, and colleagues shows that private-equity funds had returns 20 percent greater than investments in the S&P 500.

More controversial is how private-equity firms generate such high returns. The primary knock on these firms is that they make money by shedding workers. But who ever said we should judge business owners' performance by how many people are employed? Owners are supposed to maximize profits, which are revenues minus costs. And employees are a cost. Sometimes the best way to boost profits is to cut labor costs.

Related: Reduce Your Labor Costs

Think about what it would mean if we judged business owners' performance by employment levels. We'd have to conclude that Wal-Mart is much better run than Google. While both companies are worth roughly $200 billion, Google employs 32,000 people to Wal-Mart's 2.1 million.

We should also conclude that superstar entrepreneur Mark Zuckerberg is messing up big time at Facebook. The company is expected to be worth $100 billion when it goes public as expected later this year, roughly the same market capitalization as McDonald's. But Facebook employs 3,200 people to McDonald's 400,000.

Related: What Facebook's IPO Means for VCs and Entrepreneurs

Businesses make money when they are more productive than their competitors, and private equity firms tend to boost productivity. A study by Steven Davis of the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago and colleagues found that productivity at companies taken over by private-equity firms was two percentage points higher than that at a control group of companies over the first two years after an acquisition.

The productivity gains generated by private-equity firms aren't limited to the companies they acquire. Rather, the presence of private-equity firms may help keep other business owners efficient. A study by Shai Bernstein of Harvard Business School and colleagues found that having more private-equity firms in an industry led the rest of the industry to run more efficiently.

Private-equity firms improve productivity, in part, by replacing workers. In an analysis of 3,200 companies between 1980 and 2005, Steve Davis of Chicago's Booth School and colleagues found that both job creation and job destruction are 13 percent higher at companies acquired by private-equity firms than at other businesses. Private-equity firms try to reallocate talent to more productive purposes. If they can't move existing employees to new jobs, they lay them off and hire new workers.

Related: What Private Equity Can Do for Your Company

In the end, private-equity firms don't significantly reduce employment. Davis's study shows that all of the firing and hiring results in a net employment decline that is only one percentage point greater at companies acquired by private-equity firms than at other businesses.

When Larry Page and Sergey Brin caused workers to lose their jobs by increasing efficiency with an online search engine called Google, people said they were visionaries. But when Mitt Romney and his gang at Bain Capital caused workers to lose their jobs by increasing efficiency, people said they were vultures.

Scott Shane

Professor at Case Western Reserve University

Scott Shane is the A. Malachi Mixon III professor of entrepreneurial studies at Case Western Reserve University. His books include Illusions of Entrepreneurship: The Costly Myths That Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Policy Makers Live by (Yale University Press, 2008) and Finding Fertile Ground: Identifying Extraordinary Opportunities for New Businesses (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005).

Want to be an Entrepreneur Leadership Network contributor? Apply now to join.

Editor's Pick

Related Topics


Gary Vaynerchuk on the Power of Authenticity and Accountability

The entrepreneur has built his success by prioritizing these two traits.

Social Media

With This LinkedIn Algorithm Change, Your Best Posts Could Reach New Readers for Years

It's one of many new features rolling out on the platform in 2024.

Growing a Business

A Skin Cancer Scare Led Lois Robbins on an Entrepreneurial Journey. Here Are Her 3 Best Success Tips.

The actor and producer became an entrepreneur when she created a product she needed after skin cancer.

Business News

Warren Buffett's Annual Letter Reveals the Secrets and Lessons Behind $930 Billion Berkshire Hathaway

Buffett wrote about the company's unchanging investment rule and how his sister became "very rich."

Business News

A Popular Online Store for Household Products That Disappeared Last Year Is Making a Comeback

Overstock's online store will reopen in collaboration with Shopify in the coming weeks.

Buying / Investing in Business

Here's Where Venture Capitalists Are Putting Their Money in 2024 — and What Startups Must Do to Attract Funding

Here are the top five industries and projects that are currently leading the market and the steps you need to take to attract investors effectively.