Here Are the Jobs Most Likely to Be Replaced by Robots, and Those That Are Safe A new study looks at which occupations and which regions could be most impacted.

By Nina Zipkin

Bernd Opitz | Getty Image

The question of the role of robotics and automation in our everyday lives is one that looms large over conversations about what the workplaces and economies of the future will look like. As technology has become embedded into our lives, it's not so much a question of if it will affect the kinds of jobs people hold, but when, where and how.

A group of researchers from Ball State University in Muncie, Ind., conducted a study to better understand which U.S. industries and regions are most susceptible to change driven by automation. They also explored why the subject is such a fraught, hot-button policy issue.

Related: Bill Gates Believes Robots That Steal Jobs Should Pay Taxes

"Since 2000, manufacturing production in the U.S. has risen more than 10 percent in inflation-adjusted terms, while manufacturing employment has declined by almost 5.5 million jobs," the researchers noted. "Though automation and trade alone do not account for many of the changes that occurred across regions of the United States, the fortunes of manufacturing have special resonance for several reasons. First, manufacturing tends to be highly geographically concentrated, with job losses focused by location and industry. Second, manufacturing jobs have been a source of middle-class wages throughout the middle part of the 20th Century."

The study looked at the top 25 areas that would be most affected by automation. They were highly concentrated in very specific parts of the country -- two counties in Alaska, five in Georgia, three in Virginia, two in Mississippi, two in South Carolina, one in North Carolina, four in Alabama, four in Indiana and one in Kentucky.

The researchers also did a breakdown of which jobs and which regions are most likely to be affected by automation.

Related video: Entrepreneur Elevator Pitch Ep. 3: Want a Job, a Baby or Some New Friends?

alexisdc | Getty Images

Not safe: Data entry keyers

Number of employees: 2,168,000

Annual income: $29,460

Hill Street Studios/Tobin Rogers | Getty Images

Not safe: Mathematical science occupations, all other

Number of employees: 18,000
Annual income: $66,210
Paul Bradbury | Getty Images

Not safe: Telemarketers

Number of employees: 2,379,000
Annual income: $23,530
PhotoAlto/Eric Audras | Getty Images

Not safe: Insurance underwriters

Number of employees: 1,034,000
Annual income: $65,040
Westend61 | Getty Images

Not safe: Mathematical technicians

Number of employees: 12,000
Annual income: $46,600
Thomas Northcut | Getty Images

Not safe: Sewers, hand

Number of employees: 12,000
Annual income: $23,640
Dutko | Getty Images

Not safe: Tax preparers

Number of employees: 904,000
Annual income: $36,450
Boston Globe | Getty Images

Not safe: Photographic process workers and processing machine operator

Number of employees: 288,000
Annual income: $26,590

Hill Street Studios | Getty Images

Not safe: Library technicians

Number of employees: 1,018,000
Annual income: $32,310
Rudenkoi | Getty Images

Not safe: Watch repairers

Number of employees: 27,000
Annual income: $34,750
Getty

Safe: Recreational therapists

Number of employees: 186,000
Annual income: $45,890

Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

Safe: Emergency management directors

Number of employees: 105,000
Annual income: $67,330

PeopleImages | Getty Images

Safe: First-line supervisors of mechanics, installers, and repairers

Number of employees: 4,471,000
Annual income: $63,010

Sneksy | Getty Images

Safe: Mental health and substance abuse social workers

Number of employees: 1,178,000
Annual income: $42,170

monkeybusinessimages | Getty Images

Safe: Audiologists

Number of employees: 132,000
Annual income: $74,890

FatCamera | Getty Images

Safe: Occupational therapists

Number of employees: 1,146,000
Annual income: $80,150

fotografixx | Getty Images

Safe: Healthcare social workers

Number of employees: 1,601,000
Annual income: $52,380

Westend61 | Getty Images

Safe: Orthotrists and prosthetists

Number of employees: 83,000
Annual income: $64,430

Hero Images | Getty Images

Safe: Health technologists and technicians, all other

Number of employees: 1,022,000
Annual income: $41,260

Hoxton/Tom Merton | Getty Images

Safe: Hearing aid specialists

Number of employees: 59,000
Annual income: $49,600

Nina Zipkin

Entrepreneur Staff

Staff Writer. Covers leadership, media, technology and culture.

Nina Zipkin is a staff writer at Entrepreneur.com. She frequently covers leadership, media, tech, startups, culture and workplace trends.

Editor's Pick

Related Topics

Business News

Christian Influencer Found Guilty of Defrauding Dozens, Ordered to Pay Nearly $90,000

Dana Chanel was the co-owner of two businesses that she heavily promoted to her 1.1 million Instagram followers.

Money & Finance

How to Calculate Your Net Worth and Grow Your Wealth

Use this online tool to gain a clear picture of your personal net worth and protect your financial future.

Business News

These Are the Top 10 'Mega Airports' in North America, According to a New Report

J.D. Power's annual ranking named Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport highest for customer satisfaction for 2023.

Business News

Rupert Murdoch Is Stepping Down As Chairman of Fox. Meet His Son Lachan, the Real-Life 'Kendall Roy' Taking Over the Family Business

Lachlan will now be the sole executive at the helm of the Fox and News Corp global media brands.

Branding

AI vs. a Human Touch: Finding The Right Balance When It Comes to Branding

With branding at the forefront of every marketing strategy, finding the balance between AI and genuine human interaction will help brands foster authentic connections and enhance the customer experience, ultimately driving them ahead of the competition and facilitating long-term growth.

Business News

Renowned Federal Judge, 96, Faces Yearlong Suspension For Refusing to Retire

Judge Pauline Newman, a highly respected figure in patent law, has been suspended for one year by her colleagues due to mounting concerns about her mental fitness.