'It's Uncomfortable': Women Say They're Being Trolled for Dates on LinkedIn. For too many users, LinkedIn has become an alternative to Tinder.

By Jonathan Small

Is LinkedIn the new Tinder? While many of its 930 million members use the networking site for professional purposes, some see it as a way to hit on women, according to a new survey.

But this isn't going over well with many female users who rely on the site for drumming up business, making contacts, and learning about recent trends. Some are even choosing to leave the site altogether.

Passport Photo Online surveyed 1,049 US female LinkedIn users who log in to the platform at least once weekly about being propositioned on the platform. About 91% said they received romantic advances or sexually inappropriate messages at least once. Many unwanted flirtations (31%) come straight to their DMs.

"It's amusing how my inbox is flooded with more messages from guys trying to hit on me than I receive from people seeking to network. I guess my charm and business acumen are just too irresistible for some," wrote one survey taker.

Related: Don't Do These 3 Things on LinkedIn. Recruiters Will 'Spot Them From a Mile Off.'

What the inappropriate messages say

The survey asked women to reveal the contents of the unasked-for overtures and found that nearly 32% received requests to date or hook up, 30% were asked for "intimate personal information," and 14% got unsolicited flattery.

Nearly 12% of those surveyed reported being sent a crude message.

How women react

Perhaps needless to say, most of those surveyed did not appreciate the lechery on LinkedIn. Fourteen percent reported being "annoyed," while 9% felt "violated."

Some responded directly to the sender, saying they were being inappropriate (44%). Half that number just chose to ignore the messages. About 17% reported the behavior to LinkedIn or blocked the sender.

Most women surveyed (74%) found the relentless flirtations too much to bear and either limited their use of LinkedIn or left the network entirely.

"I've had a few too many instances where people took it too far. It's uncomfortable, so I ended up taking a break from LinkedIn for a while," wrote one survey taker.

Related: 7 Ways Dating Apps Are Lying To You

Why are people using LinkedIn as a dating site?

The survey did not reach out to those perpetrating the inappropriate behavior, leaving us only to theorize why the behavior seems so rampant.

In an article in Glamour magazine, one expert says that LinkedIn doesn't screen potential suitors as other dating apps do. "LinkedIn has the lowest barrier to entry and is the least 'risky' social platform to connect with someone," said Molly Fedick, formerly of Hinge. "If you get rejected, you can always default to, 'Well, I just wanted to connect for professional reasons.' This is why I think people use LinkedIn to 'test the waters'— they view it as less aggressive than a Facebook or Instagram request."

So how do you get LinkedIn back to the business for which it was originally designed?

39% said the platform should increase awareness and education about appropriate behavior.

25% believed LinkedIn should implement stricter guidelines and policies

22% called for a ban on users who repeatedly send inappropriate messages.

LinkedIn's response

LinkedIn expressed concern about the survey's findings. In a statement, they said:

"This kind of behavior is inappropriate and not allowed on LinkedIn. Unwanted romantic advances and harassment violate our rules and our policies clearly communicate the type of content that isn't allowed on LinkedIn. We've invested in features that help stop harassment before a member sees it. We also encourage people on LinkedIn to report inappropriate content so our teams can help protect them and others. We regularly share updates about the content we remove from LinkedIn in our transparency report."

Jonathan Small

Entrepreneur Staff

Editor in Chief of Green Entrepreneur

Jonathan Small is editor-in-chief of Green Entrepreneur, a vertical from Entrepreneur Media focused on the intersection of sustainability and business. He is also an award-winning journalist, producer, and podcast host of the upcoming True Crime series, Dirty Money, and Write About Now podcasts. Jonathan is the founder of Strike Fire Productions, a premium podcast production company. He had held editing positions at Glamour, Stuff, Fitness, and Twist Magazines. His stories have appeared in The New York Times, TV Guide, Cosmo, Details, and Good Housekeeping. Previously, Jonathan served as VP of Content for the GSN (the Game Show Network), where he produced original digital video series.

Editor's Pick

Related Topics

Business News

'I'll Gladly Cancel': Customers Livid as Netflix Is Reportedly Increasing Subscription Prices—Again

The Wall Street Journal reported that price hikes are set to roll out following the actors' strike.

Business News

These 11 Retailers Are Most Likely to File For Bankruptcy in 2023, According to a New Report

Several well-known retailers already filed for bankruptcy in 2023 — now, a new report is highlighting the retailers most likely to follow suit.

Business News

Man Unexpectedly Wins $4 Million Lottery — On a Ticket He Almost Didn't Buy

A Michigan resident stumbled upon a life-changing $4 million lottery jackpot when his preferred game was unavailable.

Business News

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Says AI 'Is Real' and Will Eliminate the 5-Day Work Week. Here's How His Company's Going All In.

The financial services firm advertised for thousands of AI-related roles earlier this year.

Growing a Business

Nail That Sale — Top 10 One-Liners to Go From Salesperson to Trusted Advisee

To win the sale, you sometimes have to take off your sales hat and think differently.