Portland, Oregon Imposes Strict Ban on Facial-Recognition Technology
Private businesses and government agencies can't use facial-recognition technology starting on January 1 next year.
Cities in California and Massachusetts have recently taken action against local government use of the technology, but none as strongly as Portland, which restricts commercial business applications, as well. "All Portlanders are entitled to a city government that will not use technology with demonstrated racial and gender biases that endanger personal privacy," Mayor Ted Wheeler said during a Wednesday City Council meeting, as reported by CNET. "This is the first-of-its-kind legislation in the nation, and I believe in the world," he added. "This is truly a historic day for the city of Portland."
The bill, which passed unanimously, is set to take effect January 1, 2021. In the intervening months, various city bureaus will work together to develop a plan for "creating public awareness on impacts and uses" of facial recognition — particularly around children, marginalized communities, and local businesses.
"Portland residents and visitors should enjoy access to public spaces with a reasonable assumption of anonymity and personal privacy," according to the city ordinance. "This is true for particularly those who have been historically over-surveilled and experience surveillance technologies differently."
In a seven-page document detailing the prohibition, the council noted that facial-recognition technologies "have been documented to have an unacceptable gender and racial bias" — particularly toward those in the BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) communities.
"The city needs to take precautionary actions until these technologies are certified and safe to use and civil liberties issues are resolved," the council said, adding that surveillance technologies "must be transparent, accountable, and designed in ways that protect personal and collective privacy."
Portland has been eyeing facial-recognition regulations since 2018, citing increasing concern over privately owned surveillance systems without a clear due process. "While uses of [the technology] may have benefits, the risk of misidentification and misuse is always present," the document continued.
"As highlighted by numerous studies, articles and community feedback, the problems with FR Technology are almost too numerous to count: They range from racial & gender inaccuracies, privacy concerns, issues of consent, due process, and corporations profiting off of private data," Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty said on Twitter. "I refuse to sit back and watch our right to privacy and our civil rights be stripped away so that corporations can make more money."
Companies that violate the ban are liable to lawsuits, and may be fined $1,000 a day for each day of violation.
Entrepreneur Editors' Picks
Formerly Enslaved Black Man Nearest Green Taught Jack Daniel Everything He Knew About Whiskey. Today, the Founder of Uncle Nearest Premium Whiskey Celebrates His Legacy.
Leadership Lessons From the Exclusive Creativity School That 'Packs 5 Years Learning Into 5 Days'
3 Expert-Backed Strategies for Staying Calm in Times of Confrontation
The CEO of Wayfair Has Helped Revolutionize Digital Shopping for 20 Years. Here's How He Handles Rocky Economic Conditions.
This Founder Went to Prison When He Was 15 Years Old. That's Where He Came Up With the Idea for a Company Now Backed By John Legend.
3 Signs You're Letting Pride Get in the Way of Being Successful
Chip and Joanna Gaines and Shonda Rhimes Found Incredible Success By Using This One Entrepreneurial Strategy. Here's How You Can Too.